Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Chris Wilson wrote: > > Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually > works... that statement isn't correct because this also works: #sidebar .one-image a:hover { border: 1px solid #000 !important; } > The other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra r

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually works... change #sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{ border:1px solid #FFF !important; } to #sidebar li a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{ border:1px solid #FFF !important; } add the li so it only applies to links inside the

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Try this... a img { margin-bottom: -2px; vertical-align: sub; border: none;} Worked for me in a similar situation. David On 24/10/2007, at 9:03 AM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote: Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I seem to have a problem with the link hover style i

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

try this.. #yourimage a img{ border: none; } OR .yourimage{margin:0px} .yourimage a{border:none} .yourimage a:hover{border:none;} Tim MacKay wrote: I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;} Olajide Olaolorun wrote: It doesnt work :( I just tried it now... placed it in th

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Chris Knowles wrote: > Chris Knowles wrote: > >> #sidebar a:hover img {border: none} >> > > I had a look at your code! - try this: > > #sidebar .one-image a:hover { > border: 0 !important; > } Olajide, because you are resetting a border of 1px to 0 the image will probably move so you ma

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Chris Knowles wrote: > #sidebar a:hover img {border: none} > I had a look at your code! - try this: #sidebar .one-image a:hover { border: 0 !important; } in your code you used: #sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{ border:1px solid #FFF !important; } because tou used important!

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;} Olajide Olaolorun wrote: It doesnt work :( I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi There, You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from the hov

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

That doesnt work too Ben... On 10/23/07, Web King Design <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so > give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say... > > .noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Olajide Olaolorun wrote: > It doesnt work :( > > I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css > > On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> #sidebar a img {border: none} >> I haven't looked at your code but you mentioned it not displaying a border on hover so presumably you n

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

It doesnt work :( I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi There, > > You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from > the hover style. This should work as a global rule: > > #sidebar a img {border: none} >

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say... .noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the image Ben Olajide Olaolorun wrote: Can someone please help me with this small proble

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

Hi There, You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from the hover style. This should work as a global rule: #sidebar a img {border: none} Hope this helps. Tim Olajide Olaolorun wrote: Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I seem to have a

[WSG] CSS Help

Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but i have no success. C

Re: [WSG] CSS, the DOM and whitespace (rant)

On 16/08/07, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CSS considers only element nodes to be children or siblings. The DOM > does not. Actually, selectors considers ONLY elements, never text nodes or entity references (or comments, or PIs, or CDATA blocks or whatever). Selectors work on the element

[WSG] CSS, the DOM and whitespace (rant)

Hi again! CSS considers only element nodes to be children or siblings. The DOM does not. This is a pedagogic discrepancy understandable to people used in traversing the DOM who are frustrated that MSIE is "natural" with nextSibling and that the rest are according to spec.[1] Something that

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Good stuff! Thanks! Sorry about all of the thanks, but you guys are amazing. I just learned a lot! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kepler Gelotte Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS Problem

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Thanks to all! Everything works now. Joyce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:08 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 Joyce Evans wrote: > h

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

And I should include the asterisk (*) as part of the code you gave me below? Thank you. Joyce _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Moore Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Behalf Of Joyce Evans Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 Here is the link to a website, and I've only gotten this far: http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/physician.html So far, It looks proper in IE7

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Add to Ryans change in the css below, that you have no spaces in the code for the header like this: http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/images/mneiman_logo.jpg"; alt="Melissa Neiman" width="700" height="143" /> Then I think you should be good to go Regards ~Veine > In your CSS > > chan

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Moore *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2007 12:35 PM *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org *Subject:* Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi Joyce, While this may/may not help resolve your issue, i recommend adding this to the beginning of your stylesheet. * { padding:0; margin:0; } it will set the default margins and padding for all elements to 0. You would then have to specify margins and paddings for all elements, it gives you

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Joyce Evans wrote: http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/physician.html So far, It looks proper in IE7, but in Mozilla, the horizontal navigation links do not center but rather move to the right so that I don't see the full "Contact" link. Add... ul {padding: 0;} ...to "zero out" Gecko's d

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Moore Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:35 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px; padding: 5px 0 0 0; text-

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px; padding: 5px 0 0 0; text-align: center; } this works in FF 2 but note it has not been tested in IE. RM On 8/10/07, Joyce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is the link to a website, and I've only gotten this far

[WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u

[WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

Here is the link to a website, and I've only gotten this far: http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/physician.html So far, It looks proper in IE7, but in Mozilla, the horizontal navigation links do not center but rather move to the right so that I don't see the full "Contact" link. In

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED On 4 Aug 2007, at 08:49, Cole Kuryakin wrote: > Why, however, do you wrap your link text in a ? Are there > standards - > or some other - issues I'm not aware of if you simply border your > "landing-pa

Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

On 4 Aug 2007, at 08:49, Cole Kuryakin wrote: Why, however, do you wrap your link text in a ? Are there standards - or some other - issues I'm not aware of if you simply border your "landing-page" link text with the 's without span elements? I use the span to apply other styling to the cont

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

Crockford Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:00 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED Importance: High On 4 Aug 2007, at 05:46, Cole Kuryakin wrote: > er-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. > Irritating. > >

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

> now I replace the link with the navigation text wrapped in a span > (programatically) and style the span to match my active/hover needs. > e.g. > ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:focus, > ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:hover, > ul#navTopSimpleUL li.active span > { > color: #CC0033; > cursor: defau

Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

On 4 Aug 2007, at 05:46, Cole Kuryakin wrote: er-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. Irritating. Aside from the !important solution or the (as yet untried) focus solution that Kepler suggested, does anyone else have an even more elegant option or ... for my issue

[WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

James and Kepler - Thank you both for your input; I tried suffixing the color and text declaration with !important and that solves the problem. So this, I guess, is an issue of IE's built-in proprietary styles over-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. Irritating. Aside from

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

haha - aren't we superior?? Stuart Foulstone wrote: Hi, I'd hardly call the correct use of line-height a "trick". Stuart On Thu, August 2, 2007 2:11 am, E Michael Brandt wrote: You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

Hi, I'd hardly call the correct use of line-height a "trick". Stuart On Thu, August 2, 2007 2:11 am, E Michael Brandt wrote: > You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. > > -- > > E. Michael Brandt > > www.divaHTML.com > divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting > d

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting divaFAQ : FAQ pages with pizazz www.valleywebdesigns.com JustSo PictureWindow JustSo PhotoAlbum -- Christian Fagan wrote: Thankyou for respo

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

Thankyou for responses... Thanks Michael, this is what I was after E Michael Brandt wrote: If I understand what you are asking, try using line-height instead of what you are doing now. That will keep the text centered vertically in the element. -- Christian Fagan Fagan Design fagande

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

If I understand what you are asking, try using line-height instead of what you are doing now. That will keep the text centered vertically in the element. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting divaFAQ : FAQ pages with pizazz www.valleywebdesigns.com J

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

On 2007/08/01 09:08 (GMT-0400) Tom Livingston apparently typed: > On 8/1/07, Daniel Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it. >> :) > I use this religiously (well, ya know...): > http://riddle.pl/emcalc/ Output fields to

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

On 8/1/07, Daniel Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree Al. > > Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it. > :) > > --DK I use this religiously (well, ya know...): http://riddle.pl/emcalc/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

I agree Al. Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it. :) --DK On 8/1/07, al morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > Use option 1 with em units instead of pixels for your top and bottom > padding. The padding will increase as the text resizes. >

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

Hi Christian, Use option 1 with em units instead of pixels for your top and bottom padding. The padding will increase as the text resizes. Al On 8/1/07, Christian Fagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have previously tried to create a horizontal page navigation with a > fixed height

[WSG] CSS height/padding

Hi all, I have previously tried to create a horizontal page navigation with a fixed height but there seems to be two distinct problems with the two methods that I have used to date. 1) The first method employs top and bottom padding on elements to vertically centre the text within the ancho

RE: [WSG] css type loop

On Mon, 21 May 2007 18:46:33 -0700, Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this mailing >> list, >> and the next developer to work on your web site. The users >> will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to them. >> > > A

RE: [WSG] css type loop

Good point. Thanks. L. Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 22/05/07 11:46 AM >>> > But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this > mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The > users > will still see a nice bold

RE: [WSG] css type loop

> But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this > mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The > users > will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to > them. Actually with your example, I believe there are more users who would b

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Thanks for that :) Lucien. Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Breton Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 22/05/07 9:24 AM >>> Tell that to this search engine: http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/ On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote: > More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semant

Re: [WSG] css type loop

You could use the same argument to say that all markup in sematicly neutral. That the B tag and STRONG tags have the same semantic weight since end users, the consumers of the web, nerevr look at the markup and are largely uninterested in how the content gets to be that way it is. We could easily

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Tell that to this search engine: http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/ On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote: More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on "real world" semantics in

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Anders Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of this particular plugin; and as you suggest, better again if this or something similar is supported as standard in a wide range of user agents. Agent support of extended HTML is certainly a far better means of adoption, than the approach of having to

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Rob Kirton skrev: More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on "real world" semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page retrieval via search engines. Take a look at this:

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Hi, Or rather microformats give senatic value to certain classes for the use of external programs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats Normal CSS markup improves semantics by removing presentational dross. On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:43 am, Mordechai Peller wrote: > Paul Novitski wrote: >> M

Re: [WSG] css type loop

More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on "real world" semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page retrieval via search engines. To that end they are semantically neutral -

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Paul Novitski wrote: Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic value when ids & classes are added? I think of ids & classes as being semantically neutral or inert. When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and classes can add value is, in pa

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Lucien Stals wrote: Why aren't you just dealing with this server side and generating the desired classes and tags there? At 5/18/2007 02:25 AM, Mordechai Peller wrote: I see two reasons. First, by generating the CSS dynamically, browsers are unable to cache it, thereby loosing one of the ben

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Thanks for all your comments, CSS3 sounds loads better, but it will probably be many years until we can get decent browser support! I decided to put it in as an image, because I can't hide the text of an ordered list (list-style:none;) without it causing problems with Screen readers anyway. Hence

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Lucien Stals wrote: Why aren't you just dealing with this server side and generating the desired classes and tags there? I see two reasons. First, by generating the CSS dynamically, browsers are unable to cache it, thereby loosing one of the benefits of external style sheets. Second, by adding

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Why aren't you just dealing with this server side and generating the desired classes and tags there? CSS needn't be show horned into doing this kind of work. If it were only client side code, just hand craft it and your done. If the list is dynamic, then you have a server and it should be generati

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Quoting Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. Unfortunately there's nothing you can do at this point. CSS 3's nth-child pseudo selector http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#nth-child-pseudo would help, but

Re: [WSG] css type loop

At 5/17/2007 09:19 AM, Paul Novitski wrote: Yes, but what would make sense would be to combine all the numbers into a single image and then apply them to the list items with staggered positions, rather than applying a separate image to each list item. Here's a real-world example: http://martha

Re: [WSG] css type loop

At 5/17/2007 02:25 AM, Paul Collins wrote: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of d

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Quoting Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of d

Re: [WSG] css type loop

Quoting Breton Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This might seem obvious, but have you considered combining them into a single image, and adding them as a single background to the OL instead? That would break apart as soon as the user changed text size, or the amount of content in each LI is varia

Re: [WSG] css type loop

This might seem obvious, but have you considered combining them into a single image, and adding them as a single background to the OL instead? On 17/05/2007, at 7:25 PM, Paul Collins wrote: Hi all, I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an i

[WSG] css type loop

Hi all, I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of doing this in some kind of a CSS loo

RE: [WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

Hi Sam, I can't test because I don't have IE 6 on this machine, but I see some things you may want to try: 1) Change div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a to div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a:link 2) Change div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a.active to div#nav ul

Re: [WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

Forgot to say what the problem was. all the links are not clickable. Regards, Sam *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PR

[WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

I'm currently on a project that requires me to use images for the navigation to create the mouseover effect. CSS File. div#nav { display:block; width:100%; height:28px; background: url('/img/bg_nav.p

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

On 2/28/07, Darren West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This behaviour is by design, for security reasons when the script is sourced locally (ie. if you load the website and script from your local machine) you will see this alert; I don't get the message and neither will other visitors. To add to th

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

IE will give you a security alert when you try to run a script from your hard drive. You can change this setting in IE pref's or you can insert a 'mark of the web' to force the offending page(s) to run in the intranet or internet zone... google it. kind regards, Terrence Wood. On 1/03/2007

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

kevin mcmonagle wrote: Im using the pure css - alphaimageloader hack for png transparency. The problem is that its setting of a security warning in ie 6. The pngs will only show up if you click ok and allow the script. www.mcmonagle.biz/arena7 -best kevin mcmonagle No clue. But this may f

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

This behaviour is by design, for security reasons when the script is sourced locally (ie. if you load the website and script from your local machine) you will see this alert; I don't get the message and neither will other visitors. On 28/02/07, kevin mcmonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Im

[WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

Hi, Im using the pure css - alphaimageloader hack for png transparency. The problem is that its setting of a security warning in ie 6. The pngs will only show up if you click ok and allow the script. How should i handle this? Is there anything i can do to make this less obtrusive? www.mcmonagle.

Re: [WSG] css mark up for creating table dynamically?

On 2/27/07, kevin zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm creating my table dynamically - for instance, using ASP.NET tech to pull data from a database.Question is how can i use css to mark up my table? any idea? Why is the back-end relevant? The mark-up is still a table when the browser receives

[WSG] css mark up for creating table dynamically?

hi all, I'm creating my table dynamically - for instance, using ASP.NET tech to pull data from a database.Question is how can i use css to mark up my table? any idea? thanks kevin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.

[WSG] Css nowrap behavior

Any one have a solution for duplicating the TD 'nowrap' behavior in CSS???  I find the 'white-space: nowrap;' declaration just doesn't behave the same (probably by design)or perhaps I missed somethingTIA, Mike

Re: [WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC & Mac)

On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:26 AM, Bert Doorn wrote: I'd say it is a clearing issue because of the floated definitions. Try adding this to the style sheet: #ProfileRightCol table { clear:left; } Bert, thank you! It's working nicely now. Curious, does this a bug in Gecko Browser? Did a quick

Re: [WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC & Mac)

G'day http://avanimedia.com/onlinemedia/datormagazinse_profile.html Under the "Specifications", the data is don in table and it shifts to the right outside the #wrapper. However, the table stays where it should be in IE, Safari and Opera. I don't understand. I'd say it is a clearing issue

[WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC & Mac)

Hi, can you please help me look at this page in Firefox, or other Gecko browsers. This is the first time I run into such problem with Gecko browsers and not quite sure what to make of it. The page has no validation error. http://avanimedia.com/onlinemedia/datormagazinse_profile.html Under t

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

several examples. - Original Message - From: "Martin Heiden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sean Jones" Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:34 PM Subject: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ> scroll down to the section on embed

RE: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash http://www.designbyatfb.com/test/swftest2.html Don't wuite understand what you are asking, but lol, asked several questions recently myself about valid swf files and why one worked in IE and not in FF. Here is my test

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

uot;Martin Heiden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sean Jones" Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:34 PM Subject: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ> scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed SJ

Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ> scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed SJ> flash using CSS. I really doubt that it is possible to embed flash by CSS. All these methods use the (X)HTML object tag. And this is mandatory to embed flas

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

Good deal Sean, Jesse, et al.On 2/24/06, Sean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may beof use:http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.htmlscroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed flash using CSS.hope this

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may be of use: http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.html scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed flash using CSS. hope this helps _

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case. Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree? Jesse said You can't embed Flash using CSS, yo

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

> Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom > from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case. > Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a > site or am i barking up the wrong tree? You can't embed Flash using CSS, but you may f

[WSG] CSS and Flash

Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case.Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree? -- Chrs,Mark 617-259-6124 (m)617-249-1539 (f)"to him be

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

i not source! i think that refers to a page with 'fixed' sidebars (left & right) and 'flexible' center. Anyway, i updated the sample as a whole flexible page that you can look at: In fact i have not tested it Windows Explorer, so if you spot a 'prickly', t

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

Tom Livingston wrote: On 2/22/06 5:04 AM, "Geoff Deering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can any one point me to a good example of how to do a css header with a background image 100% wide, while having two distinct images on the far left and right and they behave in a liquid manner as the brow

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

Charles Eaton wrote: On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Geoff Deering wrote: I wish it was that simple. I need something like How's this: Note: "Float" in your setup worked against the nature order of how computers read code, top down - left to r

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >