Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Ryan Moore
In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px; padding: 5px 0 0 0; text-align: center; } this works in FF 2 but note it has not been tested in IE. RM On 8/10/07, Joyce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the link to a website, and I've only gotten this far:

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread E Michael Brandt
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Moore *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2007 12:35 PM *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org *Subject:* Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Veine K Vikberg
Add to Ryans change in the css below, that you have no spaces in the code for the header like this: div id=pageHeaderimg src=http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/images/mneiman_logo.jpg; alt=Melissa Neiman width=700 height=143 //div Then I think you should be good to go Regards ~Veine

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Joyce Evans
And I should include the asterisk (*) as part of the code you gave me below? Thank you. Joyce _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Moore Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Joyce Evans
Thanks to all! Everything works now. Joyce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:08 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 Joyce Evans wrote: http

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Joyce Evans
Good stuff! Thanks! Sorry about all of the thanks, but you guys are amazing. I just learned a lot! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kepler Gelotte Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 1:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS Problem

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread rdoyle
Hi, I am out of office until Tue 13th August and will respond to your email on my return. Best Regards, Ruairi *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Ryan Moore
Hi Joyce, While this may/may not help resolve your issue, i recommend adding this to the beginning of your stylesheet. * { padding:0; margin:0; } it will set the default margins and padding for all elements to 0. You would then have to specify margins and paddings for all elements, it gives

RE: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Joyce Evans
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Moore Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:35 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6 In your CSS change to this: #nav ul { margin: 0px 35px 0 35px; padding: 5px 0 0 0; text-align

Re: [WSG] CSS Problem in Mozilla and IE6

2007-08-10 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Joyce Evans wrote: http://www.nichemktghouston.com/mneiman/physician.html So far, It looks proper in IE7, but in Mozilla, the horizontal navigation links do not center but rather move to the right so that I don't see the full Contact link. Add... ul {padding: 0;} ...to zero out Gecko's

Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-04 Thread Tony Crockford
On 4 Aug 2007, at 05:46, Cole Kuryakin wrote: er-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. Irritating. Aside from the !important solution or the (as yet untried) focus solution that Kepler suggested, does anyone else have an even more elegant option or ... for my issue

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-04 Thread Kepler Gelotte
now I replace the link with the navigation text wrapped in a span (programatically) and style the span to match my active/hover needs. e.g. ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:focus, ul#navTopSimpleUL li a:hover, ul#navTopSimpleUL li.active span { color: #CC0033; cursor: default;

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-04 Thread Cole Kuryakin
: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:00 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED Importance: High On 4 Aug 2007, at 05:46, Cole Kuryakin wrote: er-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. Irritating. Aside from the !important solution

Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-04 Thread Tony Crockford
On 4 Aug 2007, at 08:49, Cole Kuryakin wrote: Why, however, do you wrap your link text in a span? Are there standards - or some other - issues I'm not aware of if you simply border your landing-page link text with the li's without span elements? I use the span to apply other styling to the

RE: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-04 Thread Cole Kuryakin
@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED On 4 Aug 2007, at 08:49, Cole Kuryakin wrote: Why, however, do you wrap your link text in a span? Are there standards - or some other - issues I'm not aware of if you simply border your landing-page link text

[WSG] CSS/IE Link Color Problem - SOLVED

2007-08-03 Thread Cole Kuryakin
James and Kepler - Thank you both for your input; I tried suffixing the color and text declaration with !important and that solves the problem. So this, I guess, is an issue of IE's built-in proprietary styles over-riding user styles??? I've never run into that one before. Irritating. Aside

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-02 Thread Stuart Foulstone
Hi, I'd hardly call the correct use of line-height a trick. Stuart On Thu, August 2, 2007 2:11 am, E Michael Brandt wrote: You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting divaFAQ :

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-02 Thread Christian Fagan
haha - aren't we superior?? Stuart Foulstone wrote: Hi, I'd hardly call the correct use of line-height a trick. Stuart On Thu, August 2, 2007 2:11 am, E Michael Brandt wrote: You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com

[WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread Christian Fagan
Hi all, I have previously tried to create a horizontal page navigation with a fixed height but there seems to be two distinct problems with the two methods that I have used to date. 1) The first method employs top and bottom padding on a elements to vertically centre the text within the

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread al morris
Hi Christian, Use option 1 with em units instead of pixels for your top and bottom padding. The padding will increase as the text resizes. Al On 8/1/07, Christian Fagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have previously tried to create a horizontal page navigation with a fixed height but

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread Daniel Kendrick
I agree Al. Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it. :) --DK On 8/1/07, al morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Christian, Use option 1 with em units instead of pixels for your top and bottom padding. The padding will increase as the text resizes. Al

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread Tom Livingston
On 8/1/07, Daniel Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree Al. Christian its not bad. There are MANY pixel to em calcs online to google it. :) --DK I use this religiously (well, ya know...): http://riddle.pl/emcalc/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread E Michael Brandt
If I understand what you are asking, try using line-height instead of what you are doing now. That will keep the text centered vertically in the element. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting divaFAQ : FAQ pages with pizazz www.valleywebdesigns.com

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread Christian Fagan
Thankyou for responses... Thanks Michael, this is what I was after E Michael Brandt wrote: If I understand what you are asking, try using line-height instead of what you are doing now. That will keep the text centered vertically in the element. -- Christian Fagan Fagan Design

Re: [WSG] CSS height/padding

2007-08-01 Thread E Michael Brandt
You're very welcome. There are a bewildering array of tricks with CSS. -- E. Michael Brandt www.divaHTML.com divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting divaFAQ : FAQ pages with pizazz www.valleywebdesigns.com JustSo PictureWindow JustSo PhotoAlbum -- Christian Fagan wrote: Thankyou for

RE: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-22 Thread David Hucklesby
On Mon, 21 May 2007 18:46:33 -0700, Thierry Koblentz wrote: But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The users will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to them. Actually

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Mordechai Peller
Paul Novitski wrote: Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic value when ids classes are added? I think of ids classes as being semantically neutral or inert. When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and classes can add value is, in

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Rob Kirton
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page retrieval via search engines. To that end they are semantically neutral --

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Stuart Foulstone
Hi, Or rather microformats give senatic value to certain classes for the use of external programs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats Normal CSS markup improves semantics by removing presentational dross. On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:43 am, Mordechai Peller wrote: Paul Novitski wrote:

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Anders Nawroth
Rob Kirton skrev: More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page retrieval via search engines. Take a look at this:

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Rob Kirton
Anders Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of this particular plugin; and as you suggest, better again if this or something similar is supported as standard in a wide range of user agents. Agent support of extended HTML is certainly a far better means of adoption, than the approach of having to

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
Thanks for that :) Lucien. Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 9:24 AM Tell that to this search engine: http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/ On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote: More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Breton Slivka
Tell that to this search engine: http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/ On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote: More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing on real world semantics in

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
You could use the same argument to say that all markup in sematicly neutral. That the B tag and STRONG tags have the same semantic weight since end users, the consumers of the web, nerevr look at the markup and are largely uninterested in how the content gets to be that way it is. We could easily

RE: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Thierry Koblentz
But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The users will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to them. Actually with your example, I believe there are more users who would be

RE: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
Good point. Thanks. L. Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 11:46 AM But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The users will still see a nice bold heading. The

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-18 Thread Mordechai Peller
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Quoting Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. Unfortunately there's nothing you can do at this point. CSS 3's nth-child pseudo selector http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#nth-child-pseudo would help, but

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-18 Thread Paul Collins
Thanks for all your comments, CSS3 sounds loads better, but it will probably be many years until we can get decent browser support! I decided to put it in as an image, because I can't hide the text of an ordered list (list-style:none;) without it causing problems with Screen readers anyway.

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-18 Thread Paul Novitski
Lucien Stals wrote: Why aren't you just dealing with this server side and generating the desired classes and tags there? At 5/18/2007 02:25 AM, Mordechai Peller wrote: I see two reasons. First, by generating the CSS dynamically, browsers are unable to cache it, thereby loosing one of the

[WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Paul Collins
Hi all, I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of doing this in some kind of a CSS

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Breton Slivka
This might seem obvious, but have you considered combining them into a single image, and adding them as a single background to the OL instead? On 17/05/2007, at 7:25 PM, Paul Collins wrote: Hi all, I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Quoting Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This might seem obvious, but have you considered combining them into a single image, and adding them as a single background to the OL instead? That would break apart as soon as the user changed text size, or the amount of content in each LI is

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Quoting Paul Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Paul Novitski
At 5/17/2007 02:25 AM, Paul Collins wrote: I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This meant I had to add an individual class and style to each bullet point for each image, which can add up when you've got 20 bullets. I was wondering, does anyone know more clever way of

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-17 Thread Paul Novitski
At 5/17/2007 09:19 AM, Paul Novitski wrote: Yes, but what would make sense would be to combine all the numbers into a single image and then apply them to the list items with staggered positions, rather than applying a separate image to each list item. Here's a real-world example:

RE: [WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

2007-05-01 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi Sam, I can't test because I don't have IE 6 on this machine, but I see some things you may want to try: 1) Change div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a to div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a:link 2) Change div#nav ul li#whatcanwedoforyou a.active to div#nav ul

[WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

2007-04-30 Thread Samuel Tan
I'm currently on a project that requires me to use images for the navigation to create the mouseover effect. CSS File. div#nav { display:block; width:100%; height:28px; background:

Re: [WSG] CSS :Hover for IE6

2007-04-30 Thread Samuel Tan
Forgot to say what the problem was. all the links are not clickable. Regards, Sam *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

2007-03-01 Thread Terrence Wood
IE will give you a security alert when you try to run a script from your hard drive. You can change this setting in IE pref's or you can insert a 'mark of the web' to force the offending page(s) to run in the intranet or internet zone... google it. kind regards, Terrence Wood. On

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

2007-03-01 Thread Kay Smoljak
On 2/28/07, Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This behaviour is by design, for security reasons when the script is sourced locally (ie. if you load the website and script from your local machine) you will see this alert; I don't get the message and neither will other visitors. To add to

[WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

2007-02-28 Thread kevin mcmonagle
Hi, Im using the pure css - alphaimageloader hack for png transparency. The problem is that its setting of a security warning in ie 6. The pngs will only show up if you click ok and allow the script. How should i handle this? Is there anything i can do to make this less obtrusive?

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

2007-02-28 Thread Darren West
This behaviour is by design, for security reasons when the script is sourced locally (ie. if you load the website and script from your local machine) you will see this alert; I don't get the message and neither will other visitors. On 28/02/07, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Im

Re: [WSG] css generating i.e security pop up

2007-02-28 Thread ~davidLaakso
kevin mcmonagle wrote: Im using the pure css - alphaimageloader hack for png transparency. The problem is that its setting of a security warning in ie 6. The pngs will only show up if you click ok and allow the script. www.mcmonagle.biz/arena7 -best kevin mcmonagle No clue. But this may

[WSG] css mark up for creating table dynamically?

2007-02-27 Thread kevin zhang
hi all, I'm creating my table dynamically - for instance, using ASP.NET tech to pull data from a database.Question is how can i use css to mark up my table? any idea? thanks kevin *** List Guidelines:

Re: [WSG] css mark up for creating table dynamically?

2007-02-27 Thread Blake
On 2/27/07, kevin zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm creating my table dynamically - for instance, using ASP.NET tech to pull data from a database.Question is how can i use css to mark up my table? any idea? Why is the back-end relevant? The mark-up is still a table when the browser receives

[WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC Mac)

2006-03-10 Thread 郑玉萍
Hi, can you please help me look at this page in Firefox, or other Gecko browsers. This is the first time I run into such problem with Gecko browsers and not quite sure what to make of it. The page has no validation error. http://avanimedia.com/onlinemedia/datormagazinse_profile.html Under

Re: [WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC Mac)

2006-03-10 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day http://avanimedia.com/onlinemedia/datormagazinse_profile.html Under the Specifications, the data is don in table and it shifts to the right outside the #wrapper. However, the table stays where it should be in IE, Safari and Opera. I don't understand. I'd say it is a clearing issue

Re: [WSG] CSS not playing nice in Gecko browsers (PC Mac)

2006-03-10 Thread 郑玉萍
On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:26 AM, Bert Doorn wrote: I'd say it is a clearing issue because of the floated definitions. Try adding this to the style sheet: #ProfileRightCol table { clear:left; } Bert, thank you! It's working nicely now. Curious, does this a bug in Gecko Browser? Did a quick

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-25 Thread Charles Eaton
Message - From: Martin Heiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sean Jones wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:34 PM Subject: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info

[WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread Mark Arnold
Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case.Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree? -- Chrs,Mark 617-259-6124 (m)617-249-1539 (f)to him be

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread jesse
Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case. Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree? You can't embed Flash using CSS, but you may find

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread kvnmcwebn
Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case. Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree? Jesse said You can't embed Flash using CSS,

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread Sean Jones
Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may be of use: http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.html scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed flash using CSS. hope this helps

Re: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread Mark Arnold
Good deal Sean, Jesse, et al.On 2/24/06, Sean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may beof use:http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.htmlscroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed flash using CSS.hope this

Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread Martin Heiden
Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed SJ flash using CSS. I really doubt that it is possible to embed flash by CSS. All these methods use the (X)HTML object tag. And this is mandatory to embed flash

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread sharron
Heiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sean Jones wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:34 PM Subject: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash Sean, Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote: SJ scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed SJ flash using CSS

RE: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash

2006-02-24 Thread ByteDreams
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: [WSG] CSS and Flash http://www.designbyatfb.com/test/swftest2.html Don't wuite understand what you are asking, but lol, asked several questions recently myself about valid swf files and why one worked in IE and not in FF. Here is my test page

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-23 Thread Charles Eaton
i not source! i think that refers to a page with 'fixed' sidebars (left right) and 'flexible' center. Anyway, i updated the sample as a whole flexible page that you can look at: http://www.eatons.net/css/index.html In fact i have not tested it Windows Explorer, so if you spot a 'prickly',

[WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Geoff Deering
Hi, Can any one point me to a good example of how to do a css header with a background image 100% wide, while having two distinct images on the far left and right and they behave in a liquid manner as the browser window is resized, so that both images maintain being far left and far right.

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread russ - maxdesign
Do you mean like this? http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/liquid-background/ Russ Hi, Can any one point me to a good example of how to do a css header with a background image 100% wide, while having two distinct images on the far left and right and they behave in a liquid manner as

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Geoff Deering
russ - maxdesign wrote: Do you mean like this? http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/liquid-background/ Russ I wish it was that simple. I need something like #headerbanner { color: ; background: #1C3959 url(/images/banner.jpg) repeat-x top; display: block; height:

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Charles Eaton
On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Geoff Deering wrote: I wish it was that simple. I need something like How's this: http://www.eatons.net/test2/test3/index.html Note: Float in your setup worked against the nature order of how computers read code, top down - left to right. *{ padding:0;

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Tom Livingston
On 2/22/06 5:04 AM, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can any one point me to a good example of how to do a css header with a background image 100% wide, while having two distinct images on the far left and right and they behave in a liquid manner as the browser window is resized, so

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Geoff Deering
Charles Eaton wrote: On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Geoff Deering wrote: I wish it was that simple. I need something like How's this: http://www.eatons.net/test2/test3/index.html Note: Float in your setup worked against the nature order of how computers read code, top down - left to

Re: [WSG] CSS Liquid Design Header

2006-02-22 Thread Geoff Deering
Tom Livingston wrote: On 2/22/06 5:04 AM, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can any one point me to a good example of how to do a css header with a background image 100% wide, while having two distinct images on the far left and right and they behave in a liquid manner as the browser

[WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple.

2006-02-18 Thread Andrew Brown
Hello WSG, I first have something to share and as well I have a question. Firstly I have been franticly book marking and today my professor found the ultimate bookmark. Some may have already come across it but thought I'd show just in case. Go here and say WOW. http://www.alvit.de/handbook/

Re: [WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple.

2006-02-18 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/18/06, Andrew Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello WSG, I first have something to share and as well I have a question. Firstly I have been franticly book marking and today my professor found the ultimate bookmark. Some may have already come across it but thought I'd show just in case.

RE: [WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple.

2006-02-18 Thread Andrew Brown
Thanks Christian, Thank you for your help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: February 18, 2006 8:56 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [CSS Question] Single Vs Multiple. On 2/18/06, Andrew

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-15 Thread Kevin Ross
Thanks very much for the help.On 2/14/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Kevin Ross Just wondering, Al... is the _javascript_ public domain ?The Equal Height column script is and you can read more about it here: http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/pvii_columns/index.htmAlso feel

RE: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-14 Thread kvnmcwebn
Hi Al, nice layout, future proof and all, The only bummer is that it sets off my i.e content blocker. -looked at the javascript and my vision got blurry. Is there anything to look out for when playing with the column widths? -thanks kvnmcwebn

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-14 Thread Kevin Ross
Just wondering, Al... is the _javascript_ public domain ?Thx,KROn 2/14/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:From: Paul Dwyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wierd... killed half my own post with a bracket:) The rest should read validates once it is removed.much appreciated :-)

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-14 Thread Al Sparber
From: Kevin Ross Just wondering, Al... is the Javascript public domain ? The Equal Height column script is and you can read more about it here: http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/pvii_columns/index.htm Also feel free to use and abuse the little min-width expressions in the

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Derek
thx for the link... I've had trouble before with three-column layouts; Will study the code -- Sincerely, Derek E. Land, Creative Director email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile: 1-585-880-6513 the ideastreet media www.theideastreet.com 1-585-728-2748

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Ric Raftis
Al Sparber wrote: We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. There'll be more. http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm OK, I'll be the silly bugger who asks. Why is the layout using a HTML 4.01 Transitional DTD? Just curious. Regards, Ric

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber
From: Ric Raftis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Al Sparber wrote: We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. There'll be more. http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm OK, I'll be the silly bugger who asks. Why is the layout using a HTML 4.01

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/13/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Ric Raftis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Al Sparber wrote: We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. There'll be more. http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm OK, I'll be the silly bugger

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber
Christian Montoya wrote: Yes, but if you don't use HTML 4.01 Strict, you will get quirks mode from some browsers. I think that's what Ric was wondering. Eh, not on that page - but if it's important, here you go: http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent-strict.htm

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Derek
thx for the link... I've had trouble before with three-column layouts; Will study the code -- Sincerely, Derek E. Land, Creative Director email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobile: 1-585-880-6513 the ideastreet media www.theideastreet.com 1-585-728-2748

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Paul Dwyer
Little typo just before the head there Al: an extra [ lang=en ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Paul Dwyer
Wierd... killed half my own post with a bracket :) The rest should read validates once it is removed. —pd—

Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber
From: Paul Dwyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wierd... killed half my own post with a bracket :) The rest should read validates once it is removed. much appreciated :-) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

[WSG] CSS DIV problem, as weird as simple

2006-02-10 Thread Roberto Santana
Hello! I've an extrange problem, you can see it here: http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/problem.gif The page with the XHTML and CSS: http://www.2much4u.net/Problem/example.html Page code source:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >