Having hamlib change AGC settings is not a wise idea. I have a Flex 6500 and I
do not want hamlib change my receiver settings whenever I open WSJTX. Hamlib is
for frequency control and should not be monkeying with receiver settings. The
user needs to educate themselves on how to set up their rec
Exactly what issues Mike? I am using a Flex 6500 and frequently run multi
instances of WSJTX connected to slices using TCP ports. The only issue I have
seen is if i set WSJTX to use Fake It for split operation. Then some times the
radio will not transmit audio. It seems to be a timing issue wher
/2020 12:29, Jay Hainline wrote:
Using the Windows 64 bit version of WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1
When monitoring FST4 mode on 630m, I have F Low at 600 and F High at 1400.
Wide graph is using Bins/Pixel 4 with Start at 100 Hz. If I increase T/R
from 60 seconds to 300, my F Low and F High boxes turn red. If
Using the Windows 64 bit version of WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1
When monitoring FST4 mode on 630m, I have F Low at 600 and F High at 1400.
Wide graph is using Bins/Pixel 4 with Start at 100 Hz. If I increase T/R
from 60 seconds to 300, my F Low and F High boxes turn red. If I increase F
Low to 1000, then
Original message From: Bill Somerville
Date: 9/29/20 06:10 (GMT-06:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:
Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1
On 28/09/2020 13:39, Bill Somerville
wrote:
On
28/09/2020 13:01, Jay Hainline wrote
Hello All.
I have downloaded the new Windows 10 64 bit 2.3.0-rc1 and have installed it
on my Windows 10 64 bit computer. First impressions are very good with the
new modes. Received VK4YB who was using FST4 120 sec periods and also on
FST4W 120 sec periods this morning on 630 meters.
I noticed
Thank you for the update. I am able to connect with my Yaesu FT991 direct
again to control the radio.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: June 6, 2020 17:44
To: WSJT software development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.1 GA Release
WSJT-X 2.2.1 is a bug-fix relea
,
is this issue also associated with no
receive audio to WSJT-X?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 02/06/2020 17:50, Jay Hainline
wrote:
Same issue with my FT991.
Hamlib error: Invalid parameter while getting
Same issue with my FT991.Hamlib error: Invalid parameter while getting current
frequency.Jay KA9CFDSent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: Bill Date:
6/2/20 11:44 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib error with
GA
Sorry for the bandwidth. Please disregard the message. It was caught in a draft
folder and accidentally released.
73 Jay KA9CFD
From: Jay Hainline
Sent: January 17, 2020 11:44
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X 2.1.1 GA release
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: Bill Somerville
Date: 11/25/19 18:15 (GMT-06:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.1 GA release On 25/11/2019 18:40, Joe
Taylor wrote:> The WSJT Development Group is pleased
-devel] Dsec control for WSJT-X
On 06/05/2019 11:49, Jay Hainline wrote:
In the older WSJT 10 program, there is a control labeled Dsec where the
users UTC clock reading can be adjusted to manually synchronize with your
QSO partners computer. I wonder if this feature would be useful in WSJT-X
to
computer clock
appears to be off. It could be helpful if they are starting transmit too
early. Might be something for the developers could look at.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.
Bill, Mike and others,
You do realize that JA on 160 meters is restricted to using FT8 at 1908 khz?
Practice has been for JA to call for DX at their allocation and listen for NA
stations transmitting at 1840. Widening the bandwidth window is not very
eloquent. Surely using a split VFO option
I am seeing this too George as of 1415z on 14090. I remember where this could
happened in an earlier version but thought it had been fixed.
Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: WB5JJJ Date:
10/22/18 09:01 (GMT-06:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.
bug.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
If you are going to the trouble of creating code to download updated LOTW
user files, how about something to download the cty.dat country file from
AD1C's site to keep it updated? Just a thought.
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL E
Trying out the new RC2 release. In MSK144 mode, double clicking on a CQ call
in the Band Activity window to respond to a caller does not populate the
standard messages or turn on Enable TX. Works OK on FT8 mode. And responding
to a TX2 or TX4 message in msk144 mode works ok if double clicking on th
ed into the Git "master" branch.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 12:10, Jay Hainline wrote:
>
> Has Sourceforge been abandoned for posting new revisions that can be
build? I have not seen any updates posted since July
sourceforge.net
On 24/09/2018 16:41, Jay Hainline wrote:
Has Sourceforge been abandoned for posting new revisions that can be build?
I have not seen any updates posted since July 2. Just wondering.
73,
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
Hi Jay,
no it hasn't but not mu
Has Sourceforge been abandoned for posting new revisions that can be build?
I have not seen any updates posted since July 2. Just wondering.
73,
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel
Replace the arrows with the word "to" and then it makes sense. At least it does
to me. ;-)
73 Jay. KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: Al Pawlowski Date:
7/3/18 10:38 (GMT-06:00) To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:
[wsjt-devel]
eforge.net Subject:
Re: [wsjt-devel] working stations over 1 km on 6m
On 31/05/2018 17:43, Joe Taylor wrote:
On
5/31/2018 12:22 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
Joe, is it
possible to use one of the extra FT8 bits as a flag that you are
transmitting in co
Taylor Date:
5/31/18 10:34 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] working stations
over 1 km on 6m
Hi Jay, Ned, and all,
On 5/30/2018 8:57 PM, Jay Hainline KA9CFD wrote:
> We had a big opening to JA today on 6m. Some of the contacts were over
> 10,000
failed to mention that this was using
v1.9.0 r8731.
Ned / AA7A
On 5/31/2018 1:41 AM, Jay Hainline
wrote:
Hi Ned. I was wondering if you have
VHF/UHF features enabled in the settings? I wonder if this
issue exists if that box
hard thing to test.
Ned / AA7A
On 5/31/2018 12:57 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> We had a big opening to JA today on 6m. Some of the contacts were over
> 10,000 km and I have heard some ops report their WSJT-X software would hang
> up asking if they want to switch to contest mode. Apparently
much
more details. Maybe someone can chime in or advise if this would be a bug
that needs fixed.
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL
EN40om
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
eng
Isnt this addressed in r8647?
Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Date: 5/9/18 09:40 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT
Software Development Cc: Black Michael
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?
There appar
Not sure if my message got through so will try again.
Jay KA9CFD
From: Jay Hainline
Sent: April 12, 2018 12:30
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] RX messages when using msk144 mode
Running WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3 r8609 with Windows 10 64 bit. It has been brought
to
x27;s
messages will scroll off the top before you know it.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot
18 6:52 AM, Jay Hainline KA9CFD wrote:
> Is the suggested Dxpedition frequency 1.8265 a typo? That would put it
right in the middle of the CW DX window on 160m. Surely a frequency of 1.836
would be a better choice IMHO.
Thanks for catching this error. Not a typo, exactly, but 1.8265 is the
likel
Is the suggested Dxpedition frequency 1.8265 a typo? That would put it right in
the middle of the CW DX window on 160m. Surely a frequency of 1.836 would be a
better choice IMHO.
Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: March 28, 2018 17:36
To: WSJT software development
S
would mention it.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http:
My observations.
I was only able to participate during the first 20 minutes of the 20 meter
test at 2300z. Joe was decoding around -18 during the time and I was calling
using barefoot power. According to pskreporter, Joe heard me but I was never
called.
So my question is why I was never called? D
On Feb 12, 2018, at 5:59 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
>
> This only seems to happen when first opening WSJT-X. The bug does not appear
> again once it is open and have switched to other modes and back to msk144.
It doesn’t do it here…. BUT! … I use a different configuration for mos
e bug
does not appear again once it is open and have switched to other modes and
back to msk144.
Thought I would mention it.
73,
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
Check out the vibrant tech communi
I agree with Rich. 3XY has been the "standard" more than any other call I have
logged in at least the past 6 years from there. I stand by what I stated
earlier. The station Bill mentioned is probably "grandfathered" with an older
call.
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
-
Joe, I think all the callsigns coming out of Guinea have had the 3XY prefix for
at least the past 6 years. I believe an exception is warranted.
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
Original message From: Joe Taylor Date:
10/29/17 12:30 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT so
I remember seeing last spring before the FT8 craze some development work on a
new mode called WSPR-LF. Are there any plans to start development again?
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
Original message From: Eric NO3M Date:
10/16/17 07:27 (GMT-06:00) To: w
Larry K0TPP and I made another test this morning. We were both using r8111.
We ran on both msk144 and ft8 on 6 meters. The window pop up appears to be
working correctly now when the CQ station is in contest mode and the
answering station is not.
We also ran where the station CQing is not in conte
Yes we were both using 8101 and msk144 mode. We did not try ft8. Sorry I forgot
to mention it.
Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
Original message From: Joe Taylor Date:
9/22/17 07:16 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
, Steven Franke
Subject: Re: [w
I ran a test with K0TPP. K0TPP called CQ with VHF Contest box checkmarked. I
answered him with it unchecked sending TX1. The program decoded his R EM48
ok but I did not receive a pop up window prompt and the auto sequence did
not advance beyond sending TX1.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message--
Ok Joe. Thanks for the explanation.
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
Original message From: Joe Taylor Date:
9/21/17 12:39 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] NA VHF Contest
Mode
Hi Jay,
On 9/20/2017 5:08 PM, Jay
Joe and all. Curious because I am not a big contester. My understanding is the
reason for the extra coding is for producing the message sent for TX3 with both
calls plus R Grid. If it’s a problem with extra characters involved, why can't
you just condense the standard message to send a single ca
Yes, the DX station should stay on one frequency.
How do you handle dupes? If the same station continues to call after working
the DX, would the program continue to call the dupe if the DX station has Call
1st checkmarked? Just thinking...
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
-
KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: August 2, 2017 21:21
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] User Guide updates for WSJT-X Version 1.8
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 8/2/2017 5:01 PM, Jay Hainline KA9CFD wrote:
> 2 thing
2 things I noticed about the User Guide.
1. In Section 16.2 Slow Modes, FT8 is listed. Should it be listed in the
Fast modes instead?
2. There is no mention in the User Guide about the Frequency Calibration
mode feature. There should be a write up on how to use and maybe how to edit
the frequency
Will this information be placed in the User Guide? I think it would be an
excellent reference on what the indicators mean.
73 Jay KA9CFD
From: Steven Franke [mailto:s.j.fra...@icloud.com]
Sent: July 29, 2017 14:33
To: Joe Taylor
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] r7969: AP: calls out of the blue
2017 20:19
To: WSJT software development ; Jay
Hainline
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] new FT8 mode decoding
Hi again Jay,
On 6/29/2017 4:02 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> My message got bounced for being too large. So posting again with 2
> wav files instead of 3. Recorded from 50313. Please
Using WSJT-X 1.7.1 r on a Windows 10 64 bit computer.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdo
Just some food for thought.
Some of these development builds could be compiled into a exe install
package once in a while and made available from the sourceforge site or
maybe a link from the WSJT home page or wsjtx.net for those who want to try
the new mode but are intimidated at installing JTSD
FT8 mode decoding
On 29/06/2017 21:02, Jay Hainline wrote:
> My message got bounced for being too large. So posting again with 2
> wav files instead of 3. Recorded from 50313. Please check the signal
> around 1050 hz. I was not able to decode.
Hi Jay,
those are probably too weak fo
...@princeton.edu]
Sent: June 29, 2017 18:15
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs
Hi Jay,
On 6/29/2017 2:02 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> I made my first QSO with the new mode with N8JX. It seems to work smoothly.
> One thing noticed it do
I made my first QSO with the new mode with N8JX. It seems to work smoothly.
One thing noticed it does not seem that bandpass decoding is available yet?
I could not decode until I placed the marker on top of his signal.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princet
, Jay Hainline wrote:
> In NA, the 6 meter msk144 calling frequency has been moved down to
> 50260 to get away from the JT65 users.
>
> 50290 is being used for JT9E, JT9H fast modes for North America to
> Europe contacts.
>
> This is what I have observed this season on 6 meter
Daunting task Bill.
In NA, the 6 meter msk144 calling frequency has been moved down to 50260 to get
away from the JT65 users.
50290 is being used for JT9E, JT9H fast modes for North America to Europe
contacts.
This is what I have observed this season on 6 meters. Good Luck!
Jay KA9CFD
Sent fro
10/06/2017 12:14, Jay Hainline wrote:
> I need some tutoring on how to build 7703 without going beyond using JTSDK.
> Maybe someone can email me the steps on how.
Hi Jay,
I am not sure JTSDK has a direct facility to revert the sources to a
particular revision, I'm sure Greg, KI7MT, will
I need some tutoring on how to build 7703 without going beyond using JTSDK.
Maybe someone can email me the steps on how.
Thanks,
Jay KA9CFD
Ka9cfd at mtcnow dot net
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: June 9, 2017 12:45
To: WSJT software developm
What a can of worms! Its not only wspr mode, but JT65 mode on 60 meters as
well. I have not seen a single USA station transmit exactly in the center of
the channel straddling the 1500 hz audio tone as stated in the rules using
JT65. I can't imagine what people are doing with wspr on that band. Goo
I have the exact same issues that Roger described. I built MAP65 r7541 this
morning using JTSDK on my Windows 10 64 bit machine. It can easily be user
stupidity as I have not tried MAP65 before. Radio is a Flex 6500 using a DAX
IQ Stream. I could only try it on 6 meters but I didn't see any JT65
ac
e.com
On 1/10/2017 8:53 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Jay,
On 1/10/2017 8:44 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
Can anyone confirm CHU at 3330 is actually on the air? I do not hear it here
and suspect it no longer is.
73 Jay KA9CFD
I'd like to know the answer to your question, too! I find no indica
Can anyone confirm CHU at 3330 is actually on the air? I do not hear it here
and suspect it no longer is.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: January 9, 2017 21:45
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FreqCal Mode
Hi al
k on the "Enable TX" button to make it
stop now as it stays red. Hope that make sense.
73 Jay KA9CFD
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: January 2, 2017 13:54
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Prompt to log QSO when either RRR or
: Jay Hainline [mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net]
Sent: January 1, 2017 22:08
To: 'Black Michael' mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com> >; 'WSJT
software development' mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
Subject: RE: [wsjt-devel] Prompt to log QSO when either RRR or 73 is sent
On Jan 1, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Jay Hainline mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net> > wrote:
This was introduced in r7431. I think its bad form to get a prompt to log the
QSO when you are sending RRR. How do you know if your QSO partner has received
it if he does not send 73 back to you??
Jay
RRR or 73 is sent
Autosequencing works fine here r7436, even after the logging box has
appeared.
Steve k9an
On Jan 1, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Jay Hainline mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net> > wrote:
Yes it also stops the auto sequencing. I have to keep clicking on Enable TX
to keep sending
dialog box sit there until you're ready to log it? It doesn't interrupt
operations at all, does it?
de Mike W9MDB
_
From: Jay Hainline mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net> >
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Sunday, Ja
This was introduced in r7431. I think its bad form to get a prompt to log
the QSO when you are sending RRR. How do you know if your QSO partner has
received it if he does not send 73 back to you??
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
r 19, 2016 21:04
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Adding WSPR-15 mode to WSJT-X
Hi Jay,
On 12/19/2016 3:38 PM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> Since WSJT-X 1.7.0 has now been released for general availability, I
> would like to request WSPR-15 be added to the list of modes in W
for it.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel
KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: December 12, 2016 19:02
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] error on building WSJT-x with JTSDK
On 12/12/2016 18:58, Jay Hainline wrote:
> Bill should I be using a more ne
On 12/12/2016 12:50, Jay Hainline wrote:
> Attached is an error message I received this morning when trying to
> build to the latest version of WSJT-x 1.7.0-rc3.
Hi Jay,
sorry about that, a small issue compatibility with older versions of Qt.
Should be ok as of r7380.
73
Bill
hosen.
It would be useful to know whether or not your observations are consistent with
mine, or if you find that clicking on a regular end-of-cycle decode results in
the wrong sequence being chosen.
Steve k9an
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
>
> One thing I have
being chosen.
Steve k9an
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
>
> One thing I have noticed and wish it would be implemented is when double
> clicking on a callsign in the band activity window, the program does not
> automatically pick the correct sequence to tran
ion.
I do not understand why this might not be working for you. Please
elaborate.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 9/15/2016 7:55 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
> One thing I have noticed and wish it would be implemented is when
> double clicking on a callsign in the band activity window, the pro
your radio in the correct sequence. It would be nice if the program
would do this automatically so you are not accidentally transmitting at the
wrong time.
Using WSJT-X v1.7.0-rc1 r7083, Windows 10 64 bit.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
The one thing that sticks out to me is the outdated pictures of the settings
tabs. The advanced tab is missing and no mention of it. Maybe that's
intentional. :-)
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: September 8, 2016 17:11
To: WSJT software
software work as well as it does.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https
x27;m wondering if there's some subtle thing going on. See what happens for
you and I'll try and duplicate again.
de Mike W9MDB
_____
From: Jay Hainline mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net> >
To: 'WSJT software development' mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
/Elevation calculator in WSJT-X
On 29/08/2016 14:52, Jay Hainline wrote:
> No Joe, I am talking about other grids in the EN field. I am in EN40.
> If I put EN00 grid in the dx grid field, it comes up zeros.
Hi Joe & Jay,
I can confirm this defect, looks like the calculation is wrong if the las
No Joe, I am talking about other grids in the EN field. I am in EN40. If I
put EN00 grid in the dx grid field, it comes up zeros.
Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: August 29, 2016 13:50
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel
I am sorry, I meant to say Azimuth and distance calculator is not working
for Grids that happen to be in my field.
Jay KA9CFD
From: Jay Hainline [mailto:ka9...@mtcnow.net]
Sent: August 29, 2016 13:33
To: 'wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Azimuth/Elevation calculator
Using WSJT-X v1.7.0-rc1 r7036 this morning on msk144.
Noticed that the az/el calculator will not work if I enter a DX grid square
that happens to be in my grid field EN. I am located in EN40. If I try and
work a station in an EN grid field, the AZ and miles show up as zero.
Jay Hainline
tosequence?
Does it happen if you use click-to-decode to advance the sequencer before the
end of the cycle?
Any other details, or, ideally, a prescription for reproducing the behavior
reliably, would be helpful.
Thanks for the report!
Steve k9an
>
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Jay
ays select "File | Delete all
*.wav & *.c2 files in SaveDir" to clean things out, from time to time.
Fair warning: I'll be away from tomorrow through Aug 27, so will not be able
to look into this until after that.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 8/16/2016 8:00 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
114845 0 14.3 1447 & KA9CFD WA4PGM RRR
114900 Tx 1447 & WA4PGM KA9CFD 73
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
___
wsjt-devel mai
advance the sequencer before the
end of the cycle?
Any other details, or, ideally, a prescription for reproducing the behavior
reliably, would be helpful.
Thanks for the report!
Steve k9an
>
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
>
> I have been working a few people
I am not running split. Split operation is set to None. I am set up using DX
Lab Commander for radio control and PTT. Radios is a Flex 6500 for 6 meters
and a Yaesu FT-991 for 2 meters. I have noticed this audio shift in both
radios.
73 Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville
autosequence?
Does it happen if you use click-to-decode to advance the sequencer before the
end of the cycle?
Any other details, or, ideally, a prescription for reproducing the behavior
reliably, would be helpful.
Thanks for the report!
Steve k9an
>
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Jay Hainline
anyone else noticed this and is this normal behavior?
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level
I got it to run. Thanks.
73 Jay KA9CFD
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: December 26, 2015 13:28
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] JTSDK-Win32 Upgrade Available - (Import Update)
On 26/12/2015 12:19, Jay Hainline wrote:
Greg I get
Greg I get this pop up window when I run update/upgrade. This is on a
Windows 10 64 bit machine.
Jay KA9CFD
-Original Message-
From: Greg Beam [mailto:ki7m...@gmail.com]
Sent: December 25, 2015 19:38
To: WSJT software development ;
wsjtgr...@yahoogroups.com; ws...@yahoogroups.com
S
Hello Joe. I did have the start spinner set to 0. I changed it to 100 hz and
that seemed to fix the problem. This had not been a problem until r5970. I
am using build r5977 now.
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Monday, October 19
been going
on since r5970. Attached are the 2 windows that popped up.
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: KI7MT
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 04:58
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Fortran runtime error
Hello All,
For what
120709 Tx 1500 & WB4JWM KA9CFD +04
120730 Tx 1500 & WB4JWM KA9CFD +04
120715 3 0.8 1500 & KA9CFD WB4JWM RRR
120730 Tx 1500 & WB4JWM KA9CFD 73
120745 2 9.7 1500 & KA9CFD WB4JWM 73
120800 Tx 1500 & WB4JWM KA9CFD 73
73 Ja
or not.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 15:26
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] CQ Rx bug
Hi Jay,
I checked operation of the "CQ nnn ..." transmission on the FT-2000 at
unchecked.
With WSJTX controlling the radio, fake it mode is making the vfo switch to
the proper tx frequency. I think WSJTX controlling the radio is doing what
it should.
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Monday, September 14
Hello Bill. I have WSJTX CAT configured for the Yaesu FT-2000 now and with
split operation set to Rig, It is functioning correctly. So it must be an
issue with DXlabs Commander.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Monday
Tx to CQ, the radio stays on 50.285 instead of switching back to
50.280 on transmit. It makes no difference if I have split operation set to
none or Rig in the settings and the Rx frequency offset with "CQ nnn..." is
check marked.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester,
that
needs to be considered. If it is such a big deal, then why isnt WSJTX
hardcoded with the standard messages so they cannot be changed?
This is the final word from me on this subject. Time to move on.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD
Colchester, IL EN40om
-Original Message-
From: Bill O
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
