On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Hello,
> I understood that if a filter returns 16 the filtering would stop but
> all next filters as defined in filters.in.tab are executed.
>
> Can I return a value to XMail that filtering is stopped even if not all
> defined filters has run?
Such
> I am a little unclear about what the first argument
> "filter" (command keyword) needs to reflect.
Massive brain fart! Forget that display of stupidity please. ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help
> You set the "Retcode" inside the .tab file and XMail will pass the same
value to xscanner.exe, that in turn will exit with such code in case it'll
find something. I didn't do that app though, you might want to bug the
developer eventually.
I will experiment more, thanks for taking the time to h
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
>
> >"c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe"[TAB]"c:\xscanner"[TAB]"@@FILE"[TAB]"@@FROM"[TAB]
> "@@RCPT"[TAB]"Retcode"
>
>Don't add a "\" to the second argument!
>
> > where "c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe" is the full path to executable name and
>"c:\xscanner" the dire
>"c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe"[TAB]"c:\xscanner"[TAB]"@@FILE"[TAB]"@@FROM"[TAB]
"@@RCPT"[TAB]"Retcode"
Don't add a "\" to the second argument!
> where "c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe" is the full path to executable name and
"c:\xscanner" the directory where to find xscanner.dat file.
I had that
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
> > Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file.
>
> Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now.
>
> XScanner.txt leaves me with:
> 7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99).
>
> So,
>
> exam
> Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file.
Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now.
XScanner.txt leaves me with:
7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99).
So,
example spam string
becomes
example spam string#99
?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
>
> > Don't you have the source code ?
>
> Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best.
>
> My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string
> defining my spam
>
> contentfilter.def entry looks like so
> exa
> Don't you have the source code ?
Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best.
My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string
defining my spam
contentfilter.def entry looks like so
example string blah blah#6 <--- the spam score value
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
>
> > You're using SA, aren't you ?
>
> No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been
> working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up.
>
> Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes
> 97-
> You're using SA, aren't you ?
No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been
working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up.
Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes
97-99 to set properly using XScanner filter, it would
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
>
> I sent myself a test message with nothing more than test in the body, and
> yet it comes up as?
>
> Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:04:26
> UTC;[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];" # SPAMSCORE:
> 10"
>
> I have removed the entry but why in the
mines,
and fixes XMail tables for the proper [TAB] and [NEWLINE] sequences
for XMail tables...
Aloha => Beau.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:xmail-bounce@;xmailserver.org]On Behalf Of Peter Lindeman
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 2:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Beau E. Cox wrote:
> The tables all look like this (except the first argument):
>
> "perl /var/SaveMail/savemsg.pl" "beau" "@@FROM""@@RCPT"
>"@@FILE""@@MSGID"
> "@@MSGREF"
Why not the first argument as "/var/SaveMail/savemsg.pl"
and be absolutely sure that the TAB
Me!
At 16.12 20/02/2002 +, you wrote:
>Use a generic .tab filter and do the from domain processing in there.
>There's no current way to filter on from domain.
>
>On this topic, I'm in the middle of developing a perl module for my
>internal use called XMail::Filter. Currently it uses the MIME
Use a generic .tab filter and do the from domain processing in there.
There's no current way to filter on from domain.
On this topic, I'm in the middle of developing a perl module for my
internal use called XMail::Filter. Currently it uses the MIME::Parser tools
to take apart emails and add lega
I'll give it a look. Thanks...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 18:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filtering mail for specific mailbox
&g
> > 1) Block all mail to a specific mail address (I have
> > a "*" alias, but I want to bounce mail addressed to
> > a particular alias rather than having it reach me),
>
> If you want to bounce all mail to a specific account,
> delete the account :-)
Doesn't work with a "*" alias. Mail which is
> > Also I had a lot of trouble today with filters, until I realized that
they
> > fail if they print to standard output. I just wanted a simple filter to
make
> > a copy of every mail to another directory so I wrote a .bat file to do
that,
> > but the copy command wrote a line to stdout and then
> Isn't starting a process a very slow operation in Win32?
yes and no
yes, it's slower than just calling a sub part of an existing process (eg
calling a routine in a loaded DLL)
but a well written app is not too slow to launch. (unlike many large GUI
programs like MS Word)
> Since it's not recom
en running xmail in debug
mode too.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "XMail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:22 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: filtering outgoing mails
> On Tue, 8 J
I recently asked this - you'd need to write a generic filter that trapped
on a FROM domain, and acted accordingly, which I've now done. I'd really
like a way of filtering based on from domain, since it would be much
quicker for Xmail to check for a source.com.tab filter then kick off copies
of pe
22 matches
Mail list logo
