On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:19 AM, Ian D wrote:
> >Also, are you using jumbo frames? That can usually help a bit with either
> >access protocol
>
>
> Yes. It was off early on and we did notice a significant difference once we
> switched it on. Turning "naggle" off as suggested by Richard also seem t
In 3.0.3+ new option would list appliance changelog going forward:
nmc$ show version -c
On 07/04/2010 05:58 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
Where can I find a list of these?
This leads to the more generic question of: where are *any* release notes?
I saw on Genunix that Community Edition 3.0.3 wa
On 07/ 6/10 02:21 AM, Francois wrote:
Hi list,
Here's my case :
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progr
On 05 July, 2010 - Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk sent me these 1,9K bytes:
> - Original Message -
> > If you have one zpool consisting of only one large raidz2, then you
> > have a slow raid. To reach high speed, you need maximum 8 drives in
> > each raidz2. So one of the reasons it takes time, is
- Original Message -
> If you have one zpool consisting of only one large raidz2, then you
> have a slow raid. To reach high speed, you need maximum 8 drives in
> each raidz2. So one of the reasons it takes time, is because you have
> too many drives in your raidz2. Everything would be much
If you have one zpool consisting of only one large raidz2, then you have a slow
raid. To reach high speed, you need maximum 8 drives in each raidz2. So one of
the reasons it takes time, is because you have too many drives in your raidz2.
Everything would be much faster if you split your zpool in
Tristram Scott wrote:
> I see a number of points to consider when choosing amongst the various
> suggestions for backing up zfs file systems. In no particular order, I have
> these:
Let me fill this out for star ;-)
> 1. Does it work in place, or need an intermediate copy on disk?
Yes
> 2.
> After having launched replace command, I had to offlined c0t9d0
> because
> it was generating too many warnings and slow down i/os.
>
> Now replace seems to be finished but zpool status still displays
> "replacing" and according to scrub status, resilver seems to continue
> ?
>
> Any idea how t
Hi list,
Here's my case :
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress for 147h19m, 100.00% done, 0h0m to
> Just a short question - wouldn't it be easier, and perhaps faster, to just
> have the MySQL DB on an NFS share? iSCSI adds
>complexity, both on the target and the initiator.
Yes, we did tried both and we didn't notice any difference in term of
performances. I've read conflicting opini
I tried to run "zfs list" on my system, but looks that this command
will hangs. This command can not return even if I press "contrl+c" as
following:
r...@intel7:/export/bench/io/filebench/results# zfs list
^C^C^C^C
^C^C^C^C
..
When this happens, I am running filebench benchmark with oltp
workl
> At this point, I will repeat my recommendation about
> using
> zpool-in-files as a backup (staging) target.
> Depending where you
> ost, and how you combine the files, you can achieve
> these scenarios
> without clunkery, and with all the benefits a zpool
> provides.
>
This is another good sch
>Just a short question - wouldn't it be easier, and perhaps faster, to just
>have the MySQL DB on an NFS share? iSCSI adds
>complexity, both on the target and the initiator.
Yes, we did tried both and we didn't notice any difference in term of
performances. I've read conflicting opinions on
The database is MySQL, it runs on a Linux box that connects to the Nexenta
server through 10GbE using iSCSI. Just a short question - wouldn't it be
easier, and perhaps faster, to just have the MySQL DB on an NFS share? iSCSI
adds complexity, both on the target and the initiator.
Also,
14 matches
Mail list logo
