Thanks Neville, and by the way (so's not to send two emails) I got an email
from Floyd which I replied to, and it contained the bit about not being able to
be read by the silver list server - and my reply was returned! So who knows
what's going on there! Dee
Sent from my iPad
> On 19 Feb 2015, at 10:43, Neville <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well I was working on a pet private theory I've had for years regarding EIS.
> From my earlier laboratory tests the pH was between 7.0 and 8.0, on the
> alkaline side, even after weeks in storage, now if cancer and other nasties
> supposed to thrive or grow or multiply in an acidic environment I considered
> perhaps this could have something to do with how efficacious this stuff is,
> and I sort of still believe it has some merit.
>
> I also believe if taken first thing in the morning before breakfast the
> stomach acid will be at it's lowest ebb, due to having nothing to digest for
> a number of hours during the night, this also is included in my pet theory
> for efficacy. I have only stumbled upon one article which supports that
> view. May be common knowledge to other folk, but being a numpty I only
> considered it in more recent times.
>
> As you may remember, I have always held the belief that EIS ingested
> immediately after brewing contains the highest amount of Ag+ ions, {which it
> does}, and hence is at its highest in efficacy, due to relative dormancy of
> stomach acid as explained above. One other pH test I had undertaken in the
> past, {tested within hours of production and apparently was extremely high
> alkaline from what the bloke said} convinced me I may not be talking out of
> my hat. All these in combination I had hypothesised could, and I repeat,
> "could", have something to do with why this stuff is so good for some health
> issues.
>
> Now of course everything, other than the stomach acid thing, is all
> hypothesising and simply pie in the sky and has been blown completely out of
> the water with these other pH tests I had just got done.
>
> It now seems one just cannot rely and/or trust anyone else to perform any
> form of tests, nor can one rely on the cleanliness of equipment used for that
> testing. There are just too many inconsistencies and potential variables
> with DW, personnel involved in the testing, equipment used, unknown
> contaminants etc etc.
>
> It just annoys me that I can find zero information in the public domain
> regarding the stuff we make, everything revolves around that damn so called
> "colloidal silver" and it's illegitimate cousins. I am unable to find
> anything to do with our predominantly ionic product which can be taken as
> gospel or of any relative value.
>
> Today was a disappointing day for me. OK, I may use a cheap brand of DW, but
> it would be nice to try Pure Water such as chemists use for prescriptions, or
> other water of excellent purity for pH testing, even RO water, which I
> can't/won't do in my kitchen anyway, so not being strong on patience I shan't
> bother messing around with pH for a while now. The more answers or clues I
> look for only turns up even more questions and uncertainties.
>
> N.
>
> Subject: Re: CS>Electrode cleaning?
> From: d...@deetroy.org
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:42:19 +0000
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> That's very interesting Neville and full marks for perseverance! I've never
> tested for ph - only ppm and my distilled water always reads '0' on that and
> the CS always ends up about 15. Does ph matter - I mean I know it does in
> our bodies, but does it in CS? Many thanks...Dee
>
