> > > Thanks Dave, > > I didnt see the mailto: bit in the wireshark trace, that may > have been added by one of our browsers. Should the > improvement be able to pick up the divert number even if > there is no dial tag? i.e Cisco seems to format the diversion > hear with the directory number in brackets > ("6667912") and then as sip:6667912. Should the imprvement > be able to cover these formats too? Are there any other > formats used by other systems? > > Thanks for looking into this! > Abdul >
The "mailto:" URI in your trace does look a bit strange so maybe your capture tool added it, as you suggest. The "tel:" URI is described in rfc3966 and indicates a telephone number. Maybe there's a way to configure the Cisco switch to send that? Otherwise you should capture the actual Diversion Header to verify if it's sending "6667912" or "sip:6667912" (I guess you could request support for both). Dave. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/