I haven't used the Totals, but I have used 13dBm flat panels and I can move
those 45* out without noticeable signal loss and 90* with about 1/3 signal
loss. Up and down I can move 45* with 1/4 signal loss. Take a look at the
radiation map for your antenna for some idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Calkins
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 2:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] TOTAL Mental Sheet

The radio just needs to move 1/2" in either direction to through the 
microwave off someone told me, since the wave is only 1/2" or something, 
anyone else ever hear of this?  I noticed it doesnt take much to move 
the ABT when mounted with the bracket.  Definatly needs two arms.

.02 Eric :P



Smartbridges Wyoming.com wrote:
> Alex,
> My thought on the mount is that it should have two arms to
> attch the radio to rather then just one arm.  The metal is
> plenty heavy enough to hold the radio, but if there are two
> arms then there would be two bolts also which would be much
> more stable in the wind.  I don't realy think a star washer
> is needed as there is already a lock washer included, but
> none the less we need to have lock washers for the bolts.
> 
> As for bending the bracket like Jason is talking about.
>  That can be fixed by using a mount with a small mast which
> are not very expensive.  We use some kind of mount on every
> install so that we can adjust the radio in every direction.
> It can be as simple as a piece of pipe and some clamps with
> a few lag bolts.  We have a great mount that we use for the
> ABT.  I belive we get it from EC.  I can get a part #
> tomorrow from the office if anyone is interested.
> 
> Thanks............Dan 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:07:20 -0400
>  "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>WAIT!!! Don't do that unless you have a new mounting
>>bracket as well. Since the bracket does not allow 3D
>>adjustments, bending the metal is the only current
>>option in some installations.
>>
>>Thank you for the responsiveness, nonetheless!
>>
>>Jason Szumlanski
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>>Alex Wong
>>Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 1:56 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [smartBridges] TOTAL Mental Sheet
>>
>>Based on the feedback from many users,  about metal
>>plates being a little too light, we will increase the
>>thickness of the metal plate for the TOTAL to make it
>>more robust.
>>
>>Any other suggestion are welcome.
>>
>>Alex
>>sB Tech Support
>>
> 
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6  
> 
> 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6  

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6

Reply via email to