Okay... I will insert my foot into my mouth and take a WAG.
40 x 64 = 2560-sq. ft.
9 x 20 = 180-sq. ft. x 6 tables = 1080-sq. ft.
I'm trying to get a picture of what this looks like...so you are telling
me that we have is:
1. all these six tables which are separated only by 1-foot in one
direction and 3-foot the other direction
2. almost half of the floor of the room is obstructed
3. there will be plastic sheeting and tubing stored (?) under the tables

What you don't tell me is how many rooms there are and what they are
putting on the tables.
Based on the information that you have provided so far, I would
recommended that they make a choice:
A. sprinkler under all the table (probabaly not feasible)
B. skirt around all the tables (to eliminate any storage or collection
of debris)
C. make the tables (platforms) out of some kind of open metal grate
material.

rick, city of dallas

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Todd - Work
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: concealed space definition - part deux

Each 40 ft x 64 ft room in this area has six 9 ft x 20 ft tables, spaced
1 ft apart in one direction and 3 ft apart in the other. Agricultural
occupancy so OH2 design. Tables are not skirted. In addition to wood
construction, there will be plastic sheeting and plastic tubing under
the table. (I am using the term "table" because that is what they call
them). It will be a wet environment by nature of the occupancy. 

One interesting semantic note is that 11.2.3.1.8 (3), which is the 3000
sqft requirement, references 8.14.6, which is the platform requirement
also references combustible concealed spaces. But 8.14.6 only references
combustible spaces. Nothing about them being concealed

Looking at this from a practical perspective (think like fire), if a
fire did start under a table, it could have significant time to develop
before being detected. There may not be enough heat generated to
activate a sprinkler until after it is well developed. Perhaps not until
flames actually shoot up around the edge of the table. If flames shoot
up around more than one side of the table (possible in a 9x20 table),
then a lot of sprinklers over a fairly large area could open. More than
would be included in a 1500 sqft area? Potentially. This is where my
thought for the 3000 sqft area comes from. (FWIW, EH2 occupancy
description also references shielded fires). 

As for liability, the nature of our society is that we need to consider
this as well as the technical aspect of our job. 


Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com
860-535-2080 (ofc)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to