Ron,

1. The engr firm is correct...anything over 175-psi requires a PRV and
the maximum expected static pressure (churn pressure) is used to
determine where the PRV's are required.

2. If you do not put the PRV and something starts to leak and cause
water damage, then you will assume responsibility.

3. I agree with you 100%...that the churn pressure only exists during
the pump tests and that a city water supply may vary as much as 10 to
15-psi during the day so most of the time it will actually be less than
175-psi. 

4. I also feel that installing a PRV for the "excessive" 3-psi is a
waste of time and money. The hydrant test was done with a gauge that was
bouncing around between 4 to 6-psi, and what if it was only 176-psi
instead of 178-psi. However, I am not the responsible party to address
this issue from a liability perspective.
rick

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Static Pressure/Working Pressure

3.8.1.9.2 Static Pressure. The pressure that exists at a given point
under normal distribution system conditions measured ...
We have a project with an electric pump and when combined with the
current water supply the churn pressure is 178 psi. A nationally known
engineering firm wants us to install PRV's on the lowest level of the
building because of the 3 psi. Our position is that the pressure only
exists at churn and that is similar to an overnight pressure surge in a
municipal water system. The over pressure will be compensated for by the
pressure relief valves once the pump stops. Are we being overly loose
with our interpretation of "normal" or is the engineering firm correct?
Ron F  

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to