Fyi
Interesting

Thank you,
Ed Mayer



> On Apr 6, 2014, at 10:14 PM, "John Drucker - Home" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Don,
> 
> Service sizing is an interesting affair.  When people ask for a 200 amp
> service they are speaking of normal load,  as anyone who's ever studied
> arc-faults knows a 200 amp service in close proximity to a transformer will
> easily deliver short circuit currents in excess of 200 amps, how much you
> ask, how about 20, 30, 40 THOUSAND Amps, yes as in 40,000.  This is why the
> code requires the interrupting capacity of over current circuit devices to
> be equal to or greater than the short circuit current. Hence why circuit
> breakers also carry an Interrupting rating which is the available short
> circuit current (ASCC), usually breakers are marked with a yellow dot/star
> decal with the rating, 10K, 22K, etc.  
> 
> The calculation is ASCC = TFLC (Total Full Load Current) / Z (Impendence),
> for example 241A/.015 = 16,067A    This is also the reason fire pump
> controllers are SUSE Rated (SUITABLE for USE as SERVICE EQUIPMENT)  So as
> you can see a service will deliver a hell of lot more than the nominal size
> of the service.
> 
> Ok back to the service,  the service conductors are only required to be
> sized for 125% of Full Load Current, yet the overcurrent devices are
> required to be sized at Locked Rotor Current typically 600%. That's the
> reason you see these 400 A, 600A, 800A OCPD Disconnects to accommodate the
> circuit breaker which is sized at locked rotor current.   Locked Rotor
> Indefinitely, let's see how long those 125% feeders last in raceway at 600%
> (475% greater than they were sized for). The whole idea is to be sure a
> circuit breaker or fuse isn't going to trip should the motor start slow
> building counter emf, under heavy load or dragging its armature....run to
> destruction, including setting the feeder conductors afire.
> 
> Check with your Utility and see how they want the service sized explaining
> it's a NEC 695 Fire Pump, give them 125% (continuous load) of FLC and the
> LRC, etc.  Last but not least the  fire pump service should only carry the
> controller and the pump.  The rest of the stuff including the jockey goes on
> general purpose or emergency if they choose but not the fire pump service or
> fire pump transfer switch. I know 695 talks about calcs for pressure
> maintenance pumps and accessories but see what 695 covers and does not
> cover. (NEC 696.1(A) and (B)
> 
> Hope that helps,
> 
> John Drucker, CET
> Assistant Construction Official
> Fire Protection Subcode Official
> Building/Fire/Electrical Inspector
> Red Bank, New Jersey
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don
> Lowry
> Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 1:11 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Fire Pump Electrical Service
> 
> References from NFPA-20 (2010 edition) 
> 
> Situation:
> 
> Fire Pump to be installed on ESFR system  (75 hp) electric motor.
> 9.2.2 (1) or (5)
> 
> On down through Chapter 9  to;
> 
> 9.2.3.4 Where the overcurrent protection permitted by 9.2.3 is installed,
> the overcurrent protection device shall be rated to carry indefinitely the
> sum of the locked rotor current of the fire pump motor(s) and the pressure
> maintenance pump motor(
> s) and the full-load current of the associated fire pump accessory
> equipment.
> 
> OK, so the locked rotor current is 543 amps, plus jockey pump, lights, heat,
> etc added would require a 600 amp over current protective device.  This is
> what the Engineer and I determined would be the requirement for this
> dedicated service to the fire pump.
> 
> When the engineer submitted his electrical service plan (600 amp service) to
> the city, the City Plan Reviewer states that we don't need a 600 amp
> service, but rather a 125 amp service.
> 
> In reading through Article 695.4 of the NEC. It states:
> "Where the locked rotor current value does not correspond to a standard
> overcurrent device size, the next standard overcurrent device size shall be
> used in accordance with 240.6.  The requirement to carry the locked rotor
> currents indefinitely shall not apply to conductors or devices other than
> overcurrent devices in the fire pump motor circuits." 
> 
> So, does this mean that the service itself (transformer) and related
> conductors can be per normal size (125 amp) with just a 600 amp fuse in the
> disconnect before the controller?
> 
> In 30 + years this is the first time I have ever been asked about this.
> Before I was only asked about pump size etc , and when installed and checked
> at pump start-up there was indeed a fuse of appropriate size in the service
> disconnect.  So I assumed all was correct.  I'm just wanting to make sure
> the Engineer and I understand the requirements for the actual electrical
> service provided.  I know it's not my area of expertise, nor my
> responsibility, just curious.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> 
> Don Lowry, CET, RME (TX)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to