OK Boys and Girls.  This horse is dead and starting to smell.  Time to move on.

Thanks,  Roland


Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>



> On Aug 11, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sprinklers water my garden (at 3am when no one is looking). We install pipes 
> but people smoke things in pipes. 
> 
> I've always used pendent sprinklers in duct applications, in spite of their 
> actual orientation, because they would give the best water distribution. 
> 
> Sent using CloudMagic Email 
> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pi&cv=7.4.8&pv=9.2.1&source=email_footer_2>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM,  [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You forgot that buildings are sprinklered not sprinkled. 
>  
> BTW, NFPA 13 uses the term “head” quite often when speaking of sprinklers.
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2M
> 200 Verdae Blvd. 
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540
> Fax - 864.920.7129
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Steve 
> Leyton
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 10:00 AM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Paint spray application [EXTERNAL]
>  
> Pendents. A pendant is a piece of jewelry. We use hangers.  Airplanes are 
> stored in hangars. There is no such thing as a sprinkler head. That is all 
> for today.
>  
> Steve
>  
>  
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Brad Casterline <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: 8/11/16 4:28 AM (GMT-08:00) 
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Paint spray application 
>  
> Don,
> 
> I just wanted to add that I have seen sidewalls and pendants for column 
> protection accepted also. I suppose the reasoning is that the columns are not 
> the building contents determining the hazard classification. And sprinklers 
> are just one of a few methods for protecting the columns.
> 
> good catch by the way with your clip,
> 
> Brad
> 
> On Aug 10, 2016 2:13 PM, "IPA" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> There we go... the justification for the horizontally mounted pendants. Thank 
> you!
> 
>  
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Don Casey <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>  
> Heads get used in ways they haven’t been listed in multiple scenarios.
>  
> One easy one is for protecting steel columns when working with NFPA 15.  I’ve 
> used both pens and sidewalls depending on the configuration.
>  
> In a duct, we’re typically looking to dump a certain amount of water into the 
> duct which can be achieved using a sidewall or a pendant.
>  
> Side note: a pen in a vertical duct  would not be installed per it’s listing 
> and in a horizontal duct, it won’t meet the obstruction rules unless the duct 
> diameter was greater than 18inches. 
>  
> As long as you can calculate the head(s) to deliver/operate at the 
> flows/pressures stated by the applicable Standard (13 or 33 in this case) and 
> is designed to operate at the minimum pressure as specified by the head’s 
> listing (okay….not likely to come into play unless you wanted to use a K25 
> head and even then).
>  
> Lastly, if you’re a stamping professional, you can come up with any design 
> you think will work (which you’ve presumably based on data, experience, 
> calculations, etc.). 
>  
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: 2016/08/10 1:46 PM
> 
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Paint spray application
>  
> Ductwork is like protecting specialty equipment, there isn’t necessarily a 
> box you can put it in when it comes to NFPA 13 occupancies.  You have to be 
> able to analyze the process and determine the hazard before you can assign a 
> protection scheme for things such as this.
>  
> One additional tool in the designer’s toolbox is the FM Global data sheets.  
> NFPA 13 doesn’t always address every single possible protection scheme where 
> a water based sprinkler would be beneficial.  If you have questions about a 
> particular application you can refer to other recognized industry Standards 
> for additional information and insight.
>  
> The owner doesn’t have to be FM insured to be able to use this data to defend 
> or establish a design criteria for unique applications that NFPA may not 
> address.  I have yet to run across an AHJ that rejected the use of FM Global 
> criteria when NFPA didn’t address the situation. 
>  
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2M
> 200 Verdae Blvd. 
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540 <tel:864.920.7540>
> Fax - 864.920.7129 <tel:864.920.7129>
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Brad 
> Casterline
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 1:03 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Paint spray application [EXTERNAL]
>  
> Well, it's all I got.
>  
> I think there is a little wiggle room regarding occupancy classification. For 
> example, in the duct we can be max 12'-0" whilst outside the duct it is 10' 
> max.
> That's a little weak, but, seeing as how I am a NICET certified engineering 
> technician I see no wiggle room in using a sprinkler outside it's listing. I 
> believe like you that deflector orientation in a duct is a non-issue due to 
> deflectors determine the pattern at the floor, butt....
>  
> see "Ken's well known aversion to courtrooms" for details :)
>  
> Brad
>  
> ps, thank you, and you too Bob, for helping me out of the doldrums yesterday
>  
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:44 AM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Paint spray application
>  
> How do you know the quantity of combustibles? 
>  
> Typically the issues with ductwork is based on a hazardous environment 
> (transporting flammable or combustible vapors or combustible particulate) 
> that’s the whole reason behind the requirement of protection of the ductwork. 
>  The other condition is that there is accumulation of the same material on 
> the interior of the duct over time creating a hazardous environment.
>  
> So in either case there is no way to call it an ordinary hazard environment.
>  
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2M
> 200 Verdae Blvd. 
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540 <tel:864.920.7540>
> Fax - 864.920.7129 <tel:864.920.7129>
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Brad 
> Casterline
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:40 AM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Paint spray application [EXTERNAL]
>  
> To be completely formal, is it possible to consider the duct to be an OH 
> portion of the EH Classification? Not much quantity of combustible there.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>_______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to