Well, it's all I got.

 

I think there is a little wiggle room regarding occupancy classification.
For example, in the duct we can be max 12'-0" whilst outside the duct it is
10' max.

That's a little weak, but, seeing as how I am a NICET certified engineering
technician I see no wiggle room in using a sprinkler outside it's listing. I
believe like you that deflector orientation in a duct is a non-issue due to
deflectors determine the pattern at the floor, butt....

 

see "Ken's well known aversion to courtrooms" for details :) 

 

Brad

 

ps, thank you, and you too Bob, for helping me out of the doldrums yesterday

 

 

  _____  

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Paint spray application

 

How do you know the quantity of combustibles?  

 

Typically the issues with ductwork is based on a hazardous environment
(transporting flammable or combustible vapors or combustible particulate)
that's the whole reason behind the requirement of protection of the
ductwork.  The other condition is that there is accumulation of the same
material on the interior of the duct over time creating a hazardous
environment.

 

So in either case there is no way to call it an ordinary hazard environment.

 


Craig L. Prahl 
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2M
200 Verdae Blvd. 
Greenville, SC  29607
Direct - 864.920.7540

Fax - 864.920.7129

CH2MHILL Extension  77540
[email protected]

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Paint spray application [EXTERNAL]

 

To be completely formal, is it possible to consider the duct to be an OH
portion of the EH Classification? Not much quantity of combustible there.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to