Hi, >wouldn't this be working equivalent? it also copes with empty tables.. > > Yep, I like yours better. Thanks!
>i'm Wondering if all the unicode strings (at least table/column names) >should be converted back into plain strings as they have been before >autoload reflecting them from database. > > Well, some databases do support unicode identifier names, some don't. I'd say don't do any conversion for now; if someone is faced with migrating tables with unicode names to a database that doesn't support it, well, let them sweat that one :-) Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
