Dear All, 

I would like to add a few words to the discussion on the AES69-2015 / SOFA 
format:

AES69 standardizes the SOFA file format to exchange space-related acoustic 
data. The format is designed to be sufficiently flexible to include source 
materials from different databases and for different use cases (e.g., HRIRs, 
MIMO-RIRs, etc.).  

AES69 is split in two parts: (1) the main body of the text, wich defines 
dimensions and general rules for creating so-called conventions; (2) 
‘conventions' for a consistent description of particular setups in the annex.

A ‘convention’ defines recommendations on the naming of AES69 attributes, 
variables, and dimensions for particular application fields. In other standards 
a set of ‘conventions’ is often referred to as a ‘profile’. Conventions are 
discussed on the SOFA website (http://www.sofaconventions.org/). As soon as a 
new convention is considered as being consistent and stable, it will be added 
to the annex of the AES69 standard through the normal revision process. 

In other words, if you want AES69 / SOFA to support ATK, feel free to open the 
discussion on a new set of conventions.

Open source APIs for Matlab, Octave, and C++ are available at 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sofacoustics/. The API provides functionality 
to create, read, and write AES69 ‘.sofa’ files. You can freely download and use 
the APIs, in whole or in part, for personal or commercial purposes.

Best regards, 

Markus

-- 
Markus Noisternig 
Acoustics and Cognition Research Group 
IRCAM, CNRS, Sorbonne Universities, UPMC 
Paris, France 
 
> On 26 janv. 2016, at 11:30, Trond Lossius <trond.loss...@bek.no> wrote:
> 
>> On 25 Jan 2016, at 01:37, Marc Lavallée <m...@hacklava.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> As anything simpler but functional might be sufficient and even 
>>> preferable in most cases:
>>> 
>>> - Does ATK define an HRTF interface which is sufficiently flexible to
>>> be the base for a real < standard > ?
>> 
>> Not really, but you should ask the maintainers of ATK.
> 
> I don’t think ATK makes sense as a standard. The ATK sets are pretty 
> application-specific: For each HRTF it contains 8 impulses so that each of 
> the WXYZ channels can be convolved to the left and right ear. These are 
> calculated as a reductionfrom larger sets of HRTF measurements. A general 
> HRTF measurement contains much more information (measurements for multiple 
> azimuths and elevations). As such SOFA seems to me an interesting move 
> towards a standardisation.
> 
> What would be useful though, would be a standard solution for generating 
> impulses for ATK from SOFA data.



_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to