I’m not the sole author, but yes some of the recordings are made of microphones I have built, hence the name on the front of the mic and the naming of the audio files and my email address. I’m certainly not in any way trying to obscure that fact.
It’s also important to point out that we have been absolutely impartial in our treatment of each microphone and Len is the only person who has pointed towards there being any problem with the test method or the results. We have taken his perceived errors into account by repeating the measurement at a higher gain, as Len suggested that was making his mics appear noisier than others due to low sensitivity. I am happy to rectify any problems anyone points out. I have just as much to lose as anyone else. If people listen to the recordings and hate the Reynolds mics, no problem. The four of us did not undertake the comparison for any reason other than there not being this sort of resource available and hopefully people will find it useful and informative. Jack Reynolds Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Nov 2023, at 13:26, lenmoskow...@optonline.net wrote: > > > In case it hasn't been clear, the author of this comparison is not impartial. > He is a > small manufacturer of ambisonic mics, and has a conflict of interest. > > > Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com) > Core Sound LLC > www.core-sound.com <http://www.core-sound.com> > Home of OctoMic and TetraMic > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20231109/9cf51e0b/attachment.htm> > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit > account or options, view archives and so on. _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
