On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:45:04PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:53:37 +0100 > Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the > > > option to compile it in our Makefile. > > > > > > Instead, we should update the documentation to tell the users that they > > > should obtain the thing separately and what to do to get everything right. > > > > Well than we agree;) > > So I remove all of it from the Makefile and updated the docs. > > OK?
Ok for me. Maybe wait two days for a reaction on my other mail i sent on that topic and then commit it. Maybe we should mention in the README where to get libx86, since it still is not very common, but (doing a quick google search...) it seems to be easy to find, so this might not be needed. -- Stefan Seyfried "Any ideas, John?" "Well, surrounding them's out." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
