just an idea as, unfortunately, I don't have the time to do this myself. So feel free to implement it.
m On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpa...@okfn.org>wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I totally agree! > > Are you going to help out at Random Hacks of Kindness yourself or is this > only an idea for us to implement? Would be great to collaborate :) > > Kind regards, > > Pieter > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Pieter, >> >> My "killer" application to show them would be a single website that >> combines the following functionality: >> >> a) walking routes (both knooppunten and local routes) with distance as >> openwandelkaart.nl >> b) background of hikebikemap.de ( I love the hill shading) (and it's >> faster than openwandelkaart) >> c) route creation as on wandelknooppunt.be (not OSM based) >> d) tourist information >> d1) hotels, pubs, restaurants, attractions with links to their >> websites & opening hours >> (see openlinkmap.org and >> http://www.netzwolf.info/kartografie/osm/time_domain/map_opening) >> d2) the direct link to mijnlijn for busses (see openlinkmap.org) >> d3) historic buildings, etc as in >> http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/ with >> images, wikipedia links (also in openlinkmap), protected monuments, etc. >> d4) picnic sites, benches, sidewalks, road quality, other information >> important to walking/hiking >> >> I would not focus on getting only their data into OSM, (nor De Lijn, nor >> Onroerend Erfgoed), but show an app that combines all this data with the >> data we have today. It's the combination of all this data that makes OSM >> great, not the individual pieces that each institute has themselves. >> >> just my .5 cent >> >> m. >> >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>wrote: >> >>> On 05/10/2013 02:03 PM, Ben Abelshausen wrote: >>> >>>> Importing this data into OSM is never going to work I think, but just >>>> like the AGIV data, it can be used to aid mapping. This way we can get the >>>> data into OSM to a quality level even exceeding the original data. >>>> Something I'm sure data providers are interested in. >>>> >>> >>> Indeed, It would be a disaster importing AGIV data as-is , by itself its >>> very valuable but after like housenumbering my town here I can positively >>> confirm that it's not up to date with buildings newer than like 1/2 years >>> and that it still contains plenty of errors (buildings too little/ too much >>> / wrong housenumbers / incomplete ones (100 vs 100/1 vs 100/a etc). >>> >>> But to aid osm mapping and verifying, or doublechecking data, it sure >>> helps, but imports will never be as well done as a human being would >>> scrutinise the data more thoroughly. >>> >>> Glenn >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Talk-be mailing list >>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-be<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
