Nick Whitelegg wrote: >>> I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the >>> > 3D > >>> navigation stuff I'm working on. >>> >>> I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles >>> > btw. > >>> Nick >>> >>> >>> >> We do, >> > > I know, because I'm one of them ;-) > > >> but sometimes that's not quite enough. I had a path that ran >> parallel to a hedge but there was no clear indication which side it was >> on either on the ground or the OS 1:25k. >> > > Just to check, and apologies if I'm telling you the complete obvious: make > sure that the OS 1:25000 map is not the only evidence you have of which > side of the hedge the path goes. Make sure there's some evidence on the > ground as well e.g. a way marker. In this case it was by trial & error, because, as I said there it wasn't clear on the ground or on the map. The only evidence I found was a kissing gate on my return down the other side of the hedge. > Otherwise if you use that to decide > where the path goes it's probably breach of copyright. > Nick, you bring up a point that needs expanding on, but takes us away from Filed Boundaries. To get as many peoples opinion as possible I've started a new thread: Breach of Copyright?
Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
