On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:25:18 -0400 Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote:
> > Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> writes: > > > But that's how far my "convictions" go - as long as I don't survey > > where Russ draws his abandoned railway lines, we're fine. > > In terms of reaching a detente, I think that's a very important point. > I would never delete something unless I had walked the ground where it > is. If deletions are limited to cases where people are really on the > ground making a good faith effort to look for physical features, then > while Russ won't be totally happy, I think things will be 90% ok. > > But if people are deleting without having walked the ground (and I do > mean walk, not drive by), based on imagery or something else, that's > another matter. I fully agree. Making controversial edits (like cases discussed in this thread - both deleting and adding) without proper local survey is a really bad idea. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
