Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> writes: > But that's how far my "convictions" go - as long as I don't survey where > Russ draws his abandoned railway lines, we're fine.
In terms of reaching a detente, I think that's a very important point. I would never delete something unless I had walked the ground where it is. If deletions are limited to cases where people are really on the ground making a good faith effort to look for physical features, then while Russ won't be totally happy, I think things will be 90% ok. But if people are deleting without having walked the ground (and I do mean walk, not drive by), based on imagery or something else, that's another matter. (I've been trying not to comment too much, but I'm in the camp that deletionism is harmful to the community - it upsets people far more than it helps, even when correct, and especially when not correct.)
pgpdVx0Hf4Da2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
