On Thursday, September 04, 2003 at 2:09 PM, David wrote:

> (Yikes, we're strident on this list today. Please read before kicking
> us. Perhaps the CM product is not well understood yet.)

I don't think it's a misunderstanding of the CM product. I understand
the CM product very well and I even understand the theory behind it.
:) That doesn't change the objections I have (akin to Allie's and
Peter's).

As to any complaints, I'll share one of my clients' experiences with
you. He was interested in purchasing some property in a new city (new
site for a factory with a budget of over $1 million for the property)
and was given a real estate agent's e-mail address by some business
associate. That real estate company used a challenge/response
solution. My client chose not to do business with them. My client was
adamant about the way business should be conducted and in his mind, it
didn't include C/R. Quote from him - "They just told me I wasn't
important."

I'm not saying that he's right or that he would have ultimately bought
property using that company, but they lost out on even the opportunity
to do business with him. It was his perception and in business, that's
often what ends up as being most important.

Here are two articles that discuss some of the points you raised in
this e-mail and others in the thread.

http://www.politechbot.com/p-04746.html

http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000389.html

-- 
Regards,
Terry

Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3


________________________________________________
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to