Hello, Peter: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 10:20:21 AM, you wrote:
It's almost as if the anger that should be reserved for the spammers is vented on those who fight back. Like the developers of this software. PF> Not disrespect, but more like "I don't mind giving you extra work so PF> that I may do less work myself" or something to that effect. Since when is replying with one-two words (one-time only) considered to be measurable work? That's like saying that it is unfair that you and I are working here (writing this) when many others are only reading this. :-) I see it as an effort for the common good. I would be more than happy to do it for you. Like an unfortunate cost that all might share in (eventually) to avoid a problem that many will share eventually. Sobig, for example. And it might be good for the security of all, if a virus or worm arrives in email spam (that I have not stopped with CM) and then replicates itself and sends itself from my machine. D>> I don't think I have ever created hassle for anybody on this list. PF> Correct. You haven't but not all users of "confirmation software" are as PF> good as you to use it properly. I've been lucky with my training and education, I guess. PF>>> I get very few false negatives/positives. D>> Hmmm. And when you do is the shoe not on the other foot then? PF> I don't understand? Well, beyond the matter of viruses and worms, a false positive or negative likely causes a delay in reading a message. That would be a hassle for people needing a quick response. I can stop using email completely and be sure to never cause a hassle for anybody, ever. I wish you all the best, David ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
