>On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 10:02:32PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> I was answering the specific point about "the _exact_ same state as a >> clean 5.6 installation" there. >> >> There are some specific cases where it makes a lot of sense to tell >> people to rm things (e.g. base program moved to ports). And some cases >> where it really doesn't matter (old gcc-lib, site_perl dirs), people >> who particularly want a cleaned-up system will use find, others won't >> care. And some like this where it could probably go either way.. > >If during the upgrade you decide to continue using the then non-default >MTA I consider that a local change. > >Documentation helps identify which parts of your system are >non-5.6-default. In the case of rwho & friends it should have been >documentated, and probably a 'rm' hint should have been provided. > >Kind regards,
The right way to express your dissapointment with the current handling of current.html, is to submit changes to the web pages before others do. Not complaints. Changes. The complaint department is down the hall.
