> > > What I mean is the logical place for meta data about an image is IN the > image. So, for me I'm thinking that is a somewhat different exploration > than two Muuri streams? >
Depends on the nature of the notes and what they are meant for and how they will be consumed, in the use cases I described storing them in EXIF would serve no purpose. However I believe the example suffices to show that flexibility in how Muuri is used opens a lot of possibilities for users to optionally leverage. But yes, let's table further EXIF related discussion for a future separate thread so as to not go too off-topic. Cheers, Saq -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/688aedab-50cb-475d-8c29-16c67f842e13o%40googlegroups.com.
