Saq Imtiaz wrote: > The effort and resources required to implement a good discussion system > are *quite substantial, *and personally I think better spent on various > other needs in the community. >
Yeah, no doubt it would be a substantial effort. But on the other hand there's no particular rush AND I think it would bring a lot of enhancement to TW itself. A most glaring lack in TW is probably "multi user capabilities" and tools for collaboration. I'm sure we lose a lot of people because of this, particularly "business" use cases. "Multi use" is of course only one aspect for a discussion system but I also think there is a lot that is already solved or at least half-solved with TW just with what we already have. Lastly, the user split is already a reality. > Yeah... and that is why I spontaneously dislike these new "let's change forums" initiatives. I think they are more destructive than constructive. For one, IF a move is to be done it needs the endorsement of Big J. Where he goes, the crowd has to go. So just "registering a new TW group" somewhere... poor idea. IMO eating our own dog food would bring things closer together. It would be the flagship real life use case for a product that current doesn't really have any real official use case demo other than the "TW website". Why should a company, or even just someone with high demands, *trust *that TW can *perform IRL*? But I know; talk is cheap, especially from someone who doesn't really know what it takes. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5795b0cb-7db3-439b-a50c-ee2f9355563en%40googlegroups.com.
