Phil: A quick example is I'm trying to find out how their Connection Pool license works. Noone seems to know nor can I find out how this integrates with mv.Net using UO.NET as the connection. I can't find out how to configure a connection pool, monitor the connections, or anything else. [sigh] :-(
Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:56 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >Leroy, > >I know IBM are implementing much of these new technologies with regard >to U2. The problem that I see is that it may be there, but a lot of the >people in the list cannot find information on how to use it either >because this information > >* does not exist >* exists but in very basic examples which do not show > a 'real' business solution, e.g. order processing or > something similar >* exists but they do not have access to it .e.g. IBM Knowledgebase... > >Those are the issues as I see it. How to tie up the >Webservices,Soap,XML schemas etc, triggers, and existing >BASIC subroutines. And what is good and bad practice. > >Cheers, > >Phil. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LeRoy Dreyfuss >Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:45 a.m. >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >These are interesting comments considering all the tools available with >IBM U2 and the many things they have in the hopper. > >Regards, > >LeRoy > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:49 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >This is one of the reasons that Cache is able to drum up some business >from shops that are using Universe, UniData, etc... Cache is very >forward thinking, and now with their mvbasic support, a viable option >for those of us using MV databases and want to use newer >technologies to integrate with the database. Cache's native >web service support is very cool, not to mention the .Net and >java integration. This is the direction IBM needs to be heading >in with U2 if they want to stay a viable option. > >Thanks, > >Nick Cipollina ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
