Bill, If you are using MV.NET, it has its own connection pooling which is pretty well documented. That being the case, you don't even need to use the UO.NET built in connection pooling.
Thanks, Nick Cipollina -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:49 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Phil: A quick example is I'm trying to find out how their Connection Pool license works. Noone seems to know nor can I find out how this integrates with mv.Net using UO.NET as the connection. I can't find out how to configure a connection pool, monitor the connections, or anything else. [sigh] :-( Bill >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:56 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >Leroy, > >I know IBM are implementing much of these new technologies with regard >to U2. The problem that I see is that it may be there, but a lot of the >people in the list cannot find information on how to use it either >because this information > >* does not exist >* exists but in very basic examples which do not show > a 'real' business solution, e.g. order processing or > something similar >* exists but they do not have access to it .e.g. IBM Knowledgebase... > >Those are the issues as I see it. How to tie up the >Webservices,Soap,XML schemas etc, triggers, and existing >BASIC subroutines. And what is good and bad practice. > >Cheers, > >Phil. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LeRoy Dreyfuss >Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:45 a.m. >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >These are interesting comments considering all the tools available with >IBM U2 and the many things they have in the hopper. > >Regards, > >LeRoy > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:49 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >This is one of the reasons that Cache is able to drum up some business >from shops that are using Universe, UniData, etc... Cache is very >forward thinking, and now with their mvbasic support, a viable option >for those of us using MV databases and want to use newer >technologies to integrate with the database. Cache's native >web service support is very cool, not to mention the .Net and >java integration. This is the direction IBM needs to be heading >in with U2 if they want to stay a viable option. > >Thanks, > >Nick Cipollina ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
