> racially-charged nature of blacklist

There is no such thing.

Black list originates from black book, that is a book with white pages and 
black cover, with black ink, where sins are listed in haven for you to be 
judged upon.

On the colour of the cover, it is black because that's how old leather turns 
out to be.

On the colour of ink, try writing white ink on black paper if you can...

Stop using SA to push your political agenda. When v4 comes out, do not dare 
writing that *we* decided to *change* blacklist into blocklist because of the 
"racially-charged nature" of it, because it is not, because we said so, and 
because you are forcing it.

Have the courage to put your own name under your own decision, do not blame us 
for it.

-------- Original Message --------
On 14 Jul 2020, 16:48, Kevin A. McGrail < kmcgr...@apache.org> wrote:
Your association is just antiquated. I can't remember exactly when but 
blocklist has been getting used to replace the racially-charged nature of 
blacklist. Here's a public example from 2012: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklistsInclusionPolicy

This verbiage change isn't new and the impetus wasn't political nor 
American-driven. It's just the right time to do it AND we have 4.0's release 
giving us the perfect opportunity.

Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:28 AM Marc Roos <m.r...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:

> Yeah, allow/deny is more logical but using them requires all acronyms
to change.
> After some trial and error, we dialed in the changes to welcome and
block which
> also keeps other terminology like RBL, DNSBL, WLBL, etc. consistent
> so there is less upheaval.

I associate BL with blacklist. If that is how the general perception is,
and most of what is written on the internet is relating to, I don't see
how you can maintain those acronyms.
Allow/deny is also commonly used in linux so one could argue, it is
adapting to standards.

Reply via email to