On 10.12.15 22:54, Alex wrote:
I don't understand why a message from tripadvisor.com would have
SPF_FAIL, and as part of trying to understand how SPF works, I'd like
to figure out what's happening.
Would someone be able to take a look at this message and figure out
why mail from tripadvisor.com fails SPF?
http://pastebin.com/36hzGcTs
On 11.12.15 08:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the envelope sender seems to be
bounce-15_html-74319930-51788793-10834732...@bounce.e.tripadvisor.com
bounce.e.tripadvisor.com seems to have no SPF record, so I also don't
understand why SPF tests should hit at all, maybe SPF HELO tests...
disregard, please. I made an mistype when checking the SPF records.
The main reason why the mail hits SPF_FAIL is that you don't trust even servers
you receive mail from - first three hops:
h02p01.smtp.routit.net (h02p01.smtp.routit.net [89.146.30.9])
pop3.routit.net ([213.144.235.7])
h03p02.smtp.routit.net (h03p02.smtp.routit.net [89.146.30.18])
that are in X-Spam-RelaysUntrusted header.
the next server in path is:
mta3.e.tripadvisor.com ([66.231.81.9])
that passes the SPF test.
That simply indicates error in yout trust path
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller
