On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg > <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If "only providing outdated versions" is a reason for de-listing then sadly > > both CollabNet and WANdisco should go (at least when 1.10 is EOL). I can > > edit the website but I'd appreciate if anyone else in PMC would give their > > opinion on policy. > > My recommendation is we discuss and create a policy, add it to the > page and then we can enforce it. I would expect the policy would be > related to providing our LTS version and the only question is whether > we want to require the latest LTS version be made available or just > that one of our still supported LTS versions is available. Perhaps the > latter could be an exception if there is some OS that cannot support a > newer LTS for some reason.
Some websites have a link to "older releases" which are listed on a separate page. Instead of removing mention of binaries, we could move them to a separate page (called "older 3rd party binaries" rather than "older releases" since they're not our binaries). That page could have a prominent note about the disadvantages of running older unsupported releases, but leave the choice in the user's hands. Thoughts? Cheers, Nathan
