Den fre 22 okt. 2021 07:30Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> skrev:
> I confirm, I used back zlib 1.2.11 but without ASMV, ASMIN symbols > defined. Now it works correctly (even with OPENSSL 3.0). > > Regards and thank you for your help, > Tomek L > Thanks for checking and confirming. I will try to dig out references and make sure it is documented in our build instructions! Kind regards Daniel Sahlberg > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 5:57 PM > To: Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> > Cc: Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org>; Johan Corveleyn < > jcor...@gmail.com>; Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9 > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:06 AM Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski < > t.lubin...@verocel.pl>: > > >> Very strange problem with assembly code in zlib 1.2.11. > > <snip> > > > Indeed, zlib's assembly code seems to be unreliable on Windows. When I > > build / test (for signing new releases) on Windows, I never use the > > assembly build of zlib anymore (ever since I ran into problems with it > > years ago). > > I thought we had that documented somewhere but I can't seem to find it > now. I remember reading a recommendation not to use the assembly build of > zlib because of various issues. It may have been in the mailing list > archives. > > Compilers these days have gotten so good that I think it's a waste of time > to write hand-coded assembly unless there's a very specific and very > special use case requiring exact control over something. Data structure and > algorithm design make a far bigger impact than trying to save a few cycles. > :-) > > Hope you get better results now! > > Cheers, > Nathan > >
