Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 13:39 skrev Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl >:
> I’m using Virtual SVN, server shows accepted connection with code 200. > > > > I’ve found the problem. There is a problem with zlib 1.2.11. I use zlib > 1.2.7 (that was used by me some time ago) and it seems that it works OK, > now. > > Very strange problem with assembly code in zlib 1.2.11. > > > > Tomek L > Thanks for reporting back! That is indeed a very strange problem, even more so since TortoiseSVN seems to use zlib 1.2.11. Maybe you can check the same action using TortoiseSVN? Kind regards, Daniel > > *From:* Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:36 AM > *To:* Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> > *Cc:* Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9 > > > > Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 07:58 skrev Tomasz Lubinski < > t.lubin...@verocel.pl>: > > I tried once again, now with svn.exe built from 1.14.1 sources. With > OPENSSL 1.1.1l. It seems that it crashes somewhere in zlib. > > Logs attached. > > > > Can you check the server logs and firewalls as I asked in the other mail? > > > > I think we have seen crashes in zlib if zlib gets incomplete data. Which > would indicate that either the server is crashing or that a firewall cuts > of the connection. > > > > Kind regards > > Daniel > > > > (PS. Please put your post below the text you are replying to, it makes it > a bit easier to follow the discussion compared to top-posting). > > > > > > > > Tomek L > > > > *From:* Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 20, 2021 3:21 PM > *To:* Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> > *Cc:* Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9 > > > > Den ons 20 okt. 2021 13:49Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> skrev: > > I’ve checked with OPENSSL 1.1.1l, it seems that it solves problem with > segmentation fault. Now I receive message: > > Error running context: The server unexpectedly closed the connection. > > > > OK. It is obviously a fault if OpenSSL triggers a segfault if it looses > the connection to the server, but just loosing the connection is bad in > itself. > > > > Do you get any error messages in the server log? What is the server > version (and possibly platform/distribution)? > > > > Is there any chance that a firewall (either hardware or software) is > blocking the connection? > > > > Kind regards > > Daniel > > > > > > > > Tomek L > > > > *From:* Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 20, 2021 12:03 PM > *To:* Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl> > *Cc:* Subversion <users@subversion.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Subversion 1.14.1 and serf 1.3.9 > > > > Den ons 20 okt. 2021 kl 11:58 skrev Tomasz Lubinski <t.lubin...@verocel.pl > >: > > Yes problem occurs only with correct user/password (self-signed SSL > certificate used). In case of incorrect user/password or repository name, > it ends with correct error message without segmentation fault. > > The problem is when I’m trying to open RA session using > svn_client_open_ra_session. > > I’m using my build. > > > > Any chance you can verify if it is a problem only when using OpenSSL 3 (ie > did you try it with OpenSSL 1.1.1)? > > > > Kind regards, > > Daniel > >