Jeff, I could agree entirely with you. I've have some problems with the internal and external calorimeter time constants that are too short. But let's go on and assume that what you say is completely right.
Now can you tell me where in the Mizuno's results (excel files and figures) you see this behaviour? I do not see it, so if you tell me which is the right curve we can discuss about it. 2015-01-12 22:58 GMT+01:00 Jeff Driscoll <jef...@gmail.com>: > Jed is correct, when the pump is turned on and everything reaches steady > state, (using his example) the pump is putting in 4 watts of power to the > tubing, the reservoir and the LENR chamber and all these tubes and the LENR > chamber emit 4 watts of thermal power to the ambient at steady state. Then > when the LENR experiment is turned on, any delta T can be attributed to the > LENR device, not the pump (assuming the pump doesn't change speed). > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Gigi DiMarco <gdmgdms...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> The major result is that we measured 43°C in the pump body very close to >>> the water so it is really easy to understand that, despite what Jed says, >>> the pump motor delivers a lot of heat to the water . . . >>> >> >> You are wrong. This is not what I say. This is what Fig. 19 proves. If >> your graphs show something else, your experiment is different. Perhaps you >> are using a different kind of pump, or more pressure in the tubes, or >> perhaps you have confused the effects of falling ambient temperature with >> rising water temperature, as you did before. >> >> In the second paper you wrote: >> >> "GSVIT-1) We do not agree at all. The pump was not stopped during the >> test and, as Rothwell says, we are speaking about a differential >> temperature increase equal to +2.5°C. . . ." >> >> No one said the pump is stopped during the test. It runs all the time. If >> it were stopped, the test would fail because the heat from the reactor >> would no longer be collected. >> >> >> The pump power turns out to be about 4 W. >>> >> >> Suppose, for the sake of argument, that is true. And suppose that raises >> the temperature by about 6°C. (Obviously that cannot be true because >> nowhere do we see a 6°C elevation above ambient, but let us pretend it is >> true.) In that case, all of the excess heat calculations must begin at a >> baseline 6°C above ambient, because the pump is always left on. Therefore >> this has absolutely no impact on the excess heat measurement. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Jeff Driscoll > 617-290-1998 >
