In the E-Cat reactor design, Rossi was using heat to pump the LENR
reaction. When he did this, heat produces unsolvable control problems in
that meltdowns would happen snore or later. In the Qx design, he uses light
to pump the LENR reaction. Now, light goes in and heat comes out. There is
no connection between the heat input and the heat output. Stop the light
and the LENR reaction stops. Now in the QX, control is easy, The Qx is a
high intensity light. The QX is basically a HID (high intensity discharge)
light where RF drives the production of light. That HID light pumps the
LENR reaction. Stop the RF and the light pumping and LENR also stops; no
more meltdowns.
If anybody wants to produce a commercial LENR product, they must stop using
heat pumping and start using light pumping.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:54 PM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By Rossi's own standard he hasn't proven anything. ("The market will
> decide")
> Why do his defender's require a lower standard of proof than Rossi himself
> ?
>
> Harry
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:06 AM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
> bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Russ—
>>
>>
>>
>> As you point the baggage of negative feedback is great. It also carries
>> a signature on hopelessness, I would say.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Cook
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 18, 2018 2:16:34 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:LENR fission
>>
>>
>> At least Jed make the lines of credibility clear, either Rossi is a fraud
>> or Jed is. The jury is still out. If the E-Cat roars then I propose that
>> Jed do the honourable Japanese thing and commit internet seppuku and STFU.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:53 PM
>> *To:* Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:LENR fission
>>
>>
>>
>> JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> In fact, his E-Cat system demands it.
>>
>>
>>
>> The E-Cat does not work. It is a fraud.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyone who accepts the positive feedback modality should realize that it
>> comes with a lot of baggage.
>>
>>
>>
>> The data shows positive feedback. Anyone who rejects data is not doing
>> science. You have to accept what the experiments show.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
