From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:49 PM
To: Vortex-L
Subject: Re: [Vo]: PhysOrg article on breaking Plank's law
Horace,
August 04, 2009 1:49 PM Horace Heffner wrote:
On Aug 3, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Frank Roarty wrote:
Yes,
It is actually one of the paths that led me into adopting
Naudts' relativistic solution in that everyone was assuming the hydrogen
orbital must be getting smaller because the only other variable in the
energy equation was Planck's constant - or not so constant from a
relativistic perspective :_)
It is the opposite side of the same coin - I call it Lorentz contraction but
you can also say Plank's constant gets smaller as the ratio of small to
large vacuum flux
Increases- I would even propose that it becomes much larger as the ratio
goes in the opposite direction approaching C or an event horizon.
I just converted a power point to html that touches on this
http://www.byzipp.com/energy/excessHeat.htm
Fran
Naudts relativistic analysis *does* show the hydrino orbital is smaller.
Yes, but it shows it via relativistic method meaning it appears unchanged to
another local hydrino which is why I proposed Lorentz contraction another
relative effect. Suggesting that Plancks' constant got "relatively" smaller
is equivalent. I don't believe size really changes from a 4D perspective
but we only view a 3D surface.
Best Regards
Fran
BTW I must have failed to send previously or sent it to your home address
because I know I already replied to this but it doesn't show in my mail.
