With all the interaction that JC has had on this discussion group, he should be 
well aware that most
contributors on this list are probably at least as knowledgeable as he, and 
probably much more so.
His statement about "the language of physics is math" is obvious. And CH's 
suspicions are wrong...
    "I suspect that the sort of answer that Mark seeks could not be written 
mathematically." 
Of course it could be written mathematically!
 
Mathematics is an extremely diverse field, and much of it is abstract and/or 
has absolutely NO
relation to any real physical manifestations.  It is my contention that some 
critical aspects of
mainstream physical theories contain such abstract mathematical constructs... I 
think it would be
quite fruitful to re-examine theoretical concepts with a fresh approach based 
on rational physical
constructs.

-Mark

  _____  

From: Charles Hope [mailto:lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular?



On May 26, 2011, at 4:09, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> wrote:



 The language of physics is math. 






This is a deep statement, worth unpacking. It means that if an idea can't be 
written mathematically,
it is not physics. I suspect that the sort of answer that Mark seeks could not 
be written
mathematically. 

Reply via email to