This is a misconception of Rossi's device. The heat is common to the region where the cores are located. Since each core generates extra heat, none is actually lost. In fact they effect each other in a positive feedback manner. How do you think that he achieves a COP of 6 in the 3 core unit otherwise? The COP is only approximately 3 with 1 core.
I know the data is confusing. The thermocouples are tricky at best, but there are some data points that can be trusted. Working with these, I was able to untangle the mess. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2011 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing /snip/ Actually, there is no reason to believe that it will require additional input nergy to activate the 2 extra cores. He has a COP of 6 when all are used which esults in an output of 1558 * 6 = 9348 each ECAT of 107 total. I used the test ata to determine that this was entirely in line with the results expected in he driven mode. He did not use 3 for his test....the output of the 1 MW system roved that indirectly." snip/ f the 3 cells are in parallel, you have 3 core heaters. Tripling the number of arallel loads, would result in one third of the circuit's reactance, and herefore three times the total current... x A(3) = Power(3) ripling input power
