It is OK, I understood what you meant. The main thing Rossi needs to figure is how to keep the cores at the operating temperature. I have suggested to him that he should insulate the cores from the heat sink to an engineered degree and I think he has done that. The core heaters need to be in close contact to the cores also insulated properly from the heat sink to allow the best control of heat and temperature.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2011 4:58 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing By reactance, I misspoke, meaning impedance, but you get the point. If each "wafer" has its own core heater, the input current would have to triple to support three cells. > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:40:24 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing > From: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > /snip/ > "Actually, there is no reason to believe that it will require additional > input energy to activate the 2 extra cores. He has a COP of 6 when all are > used which results in an output of 1558 * 6 = 9348 each ECAT of 107 total. I > used the test data to determine that this was entirely in line with the > results expected in the driven mode. He did not use 3 for his test....the > output of the 1 MW system proved that indirectly." > /snip/ > If the 3 cells are in parallel, you have 3 core heaters. Tripling the number > of parallel loads, would result in one third of the circuit's reactance, and > therefore three times the total current... > V x A(3) = Power(3) > Tripling input power
