/snip/ "Actually, there is no reason to believe that it will require additional input energy to activate the 2 extra cores. He has a COP of 6 when all are used which results in an output of 1558 * 6 = 9348 each ECAT of 107 total. I used the test data to determine that this was entirely in line with the results expected in the driven mode. He did not use 3 for his test....the output of the 1 MW system proved that indirectly." /snip/ If the 3 cells are in parallel, you have 3 core heaters. Tripling the number of parallel loads, would result in one third of the circuit's reactance, and therefore three times the total current... V x A(3) = Power(3) Tripling input power
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Wou... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Wou... Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Wou... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been ... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been ... Mary Yugo
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convinci... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Conv... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Conv... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Conv... Mary Yugo
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing Robert Leguillon
- RE: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convinci... Robert Leguillon
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Conv... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convinci... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing Robert Leguillon
- [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing Craig Brown
- Re: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convinci... Terry Blanton
- RE: [Vo]: ECAT With 3 Cores Would Have Been Convincing Craig Brown