On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, you are just "polite". But you are extremely repetitve. You make > request that know will not be fullfilled, at least according to your > tastes, you do that all the time. That repetition is annoying. Perhaps but I never originate messages of that sort. I only respond to comments from others when it is clear that they are not considering the issues I think are important. Almost always, those are also restatements of views. I think everyone does that here in response to others. > And, why wouldn`t I think that you work for an energy company? > I suppose it doesn't really matter -- the discussion should be about issues and not what someone is or who they work for. I do get tired of people saying with apparent certainty that I am somehow "against" cold fusion because I am distrustful of Rossi. Nothing is further from the truth. I would like very much for cold fusion to be a useful energy source. I would be happy to see convincing evidence that it is. I was extremely optimistic when I first read about Rossi and could hardly wait for the details of the methods and data used by Levi in his February experiment to come out. I was deeply disappointed to find that "the dog ate his homework" and he wouldn't give anyone any valid information. I was deeply disappointed that this incredible oversight has not been corrected since. I was disappointed again by Rossi's tangential responses and censorship of excellent questions, and well... I won't repeat the rest. I wish Rossi did not act like a classical free energy scammer but he most often does! You say that Rossi has all signs of being a scammer, why not that you work > for an energy company? > I only wish one would pay me! I'm pretty good at nosing out scams. Some of my work involves trouble shooting and looking for unusual solutions to unpleasant problems with technology. But no, I don't work for them. The only companies I have worked for are research and technology products companies and while some had energy related programs and contracts, I was not personally involved in them-- not a single one. > It is very common for companies to employ people to derail others in > forums. > I doubt it very much but if you know of cases, please provide some evidence-- any evidence -- of a large company which you know employs people to derail internet forums. Most large companies pay no attention to them at all.
