Let me be clear, Axil. I have not hit on anything. Kim first suggested
a BEC can form at high temperatures in a lattice. I do not believe
this is possible. I DO NOT accept this as an explanation of LENR.
The BEC is known from experience and theory to only form near absolute
zero. If a lattice is able to form a BEC based on hydrogen at room
temperature and above, this by itself would be a Nobel Prize discovery
if true. I see no reason to apply an explanation that is so unique to
explain CF. In addition, the behavior, as I note below, is not
consistent with what is observed. This does not account for the few
neutrons. The few neutrons are near background and can be more easily
explained as a result of fractofusion.
Ed Storms
On May 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
Ed has hit upon the secret of LENR in a back handed way. BEC can
form at extreme temperatures; this miracle is the backbone of LENR.
Electrons can be broken apart into thier constituent components:
charge, angular momentum, and spin.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/04/electrons-like-gaul-come-in-three-parts/
http://www.physics.harvard.edu/Thesespdfs/tserkovnyak.pdf
In thin nanoantennas, charge is broken free of the electron and is
free to combine with light to form a polariton.
Since light can readily form condensates, AKS lasers, charge is
taken along for the ride. Extreme amounts of charge are accumulated
and light/charge is compressed into a dark photon singularity.
Ed must eventually understand the new science of topological
materials and the formation of quasiparticles.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
That is the idea. However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving
just enough unreacted hydrons available to carry all the energy
without it producing energetic radiation? I would expect
occasionally, many hydrons would fuse leaving too few unreacted
hydrons so that the dissipated energy would have to be very
energetic and easily detected. Also, how is this mass-energy
coupled to the unreacted hydrons? The BEC is not stable at high
temperatures, which would be present inside the BEC when mass-energy
was released. I would expect this release would destroy the BEC,
leaving the fused hydrons to dissipate energy by the normal hot
fusion method. The concept appears to have many logical flaws.
Ed Storms
On May 27, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Then is that an explanation of why Gamma rays are not observed in
LENR? If 2 of the atoms inside a multi-atom BEC fuse together, the
incoming radiation (to the rest of the BEC) gets subdivided based
upon how many atoms have formed the BEC. Right?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
wrote:
This paper verifies that a photon eradiated Bose-Einstein
condensate will cut the frequency of incoming photons by dividing
that frequency between N numbers of atoms.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf
Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate
“The results of theoretical simulations are represented by the
continuous lines.
According to the super-atom picture the collective Rabi frequency
for the coherent excitation of N atoms is
frequency (collective) = square root(number of atoms) X
frequency(single);
Where the single-particle Rabi frequency (single) is app 2 pi x 200
kHz for our experimental parameters.”
