Robin,
If UV is the type of radiation being released and is not capable of ionizing the nearby free gas then your point is valid. I have a suspicion that we are speaking of low energy X rays instead due to the magnitude of the energy released. How many atoms must share the MeV level of release to allow each to only emit UV? Then again, the lack of additional ionization might support the concept that UV is the radiation typically emitted. Perhaps there may be occasions when the higher energy radiation is emitted leading to run away conditions. Evidence might be there that is not taken into account. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 1:49 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi and DGT Similarity? In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:08:53 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] >If it in fact does achieve this goal, then is this process not what DGT needs for their device to function properly? Why does the release of energy from the reaction not supplement that from their spark system and hence lead to additional reactions? Perhaps this does occur and could result in thermal run away of their unit. Because the sparks have enough energy to split Hydrino molecules, whereas the UV does not. ;> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
