Rossi was never successful in getting DGT to fund addition reactor
development of his fraud design.

DGT then made of build over buy decision.

should read:

Rossi was never successful in getting DGT to fund addition reactor
development of his *failed* design.

DGT then made *a* build over buy decision.



On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rossi decided to leave the DGT arrangement, not DGT. DGT simply would not
> give Rossi any money for a flawed reactor design. Rossi worked to fix the
> control of his reactor for some time after DGT refused to pay for his
> reactor. Is this what "starve him into submission" means? Rossi asked DGT
> many times for money, and DGT said no many times. Is this what "starve him
> into submission" means?
>
> When his money got really tight, Rossi had to leave the DGT deal
> to find R&D funding. Totally understandable. But without Rossi, DGT was in
> trouble, don't you think.
>
> If you remember, Rossi had little personal money remaining to fix his
> reactor so he had to do repeated demos to interest somebody to fund his
> further development. Rossi was never successful in getting DGT to fund
> addition reactor development of his fraud design.
>
> DGT then made of build over buy decision. I believe that if DGT had not
> come up with the solution for his reactor control problem, Rossi would
> still be working on that original failed design.
>
> This is all strictly business; there is no blame here and no plan to
> "starve him into submission".
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > When Rossi decided to leave DGT holding the bag by pulling out of the
>> deal,
>> > DGT was faced with a forced closure of their operation.
>>
>> WTF, Axil, are you rewriting history?!?
>>
>> DGT promised funding to Rossi if he met certain criteria.  That
>> included a stable reactor by a certain deadline.
>>
>> Rossi had a reactor; but, it was not stable.  DGT pulled the funding
>> based on Rossi's failure to meet the requirements of the agreement and
>> decided to pursue the project on their own.
>>
>> Who are you and why are you doing this?
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to