On 13 May 2014 07:27, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 12, 2014 9:10 PM, "Kevin Gorman" <kgor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the fact Commons' has a history of not wanting to comply with WMF board >> resolutions >> > Whoa there, I'm going to have to reach for my biggest [citation needed] > flag. > > Commons isn't a thing that speaks with a single voice, and -- more > importantly -- with literally hundreds of files proposed for deletion every > day, there are bound to be plenty of decisions that are either wrong, or > debatable. Whatever experience you're generalizing on to make this sweeping > statement of an entire project "not wanting to comply," I am pretty > confident you are making a leap of logic or two in there.
+1 I have no recollection of becoming part of a Borg collective. ... > We can go back and forth as long as you want -- I'd suggest you start off > with maybe 5 examples, and if you do I'll find 25. But do as many as you'd > like. Let's not go there. This email thread is TLDR, hard to follow, and (as has been said by several others already) would be much better as an on-wiki narrative thread in one of the many places on Commons where discuss policies and issues of interest to Commons contributors; most of us are not subscribed to this email list. Fae -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
