Hi! > 3) not being able to discuss cases clearly also bothers me too as I can't > clarify points. But these secrecy is there for a reason. We have cases of > sexual harassment in Wikimedia events, do you want us to communicate those > too? And if not, where and who supposed to draw the line between public and > non-public cases? I'm very much for more transparency but if we don't iron > things out before implementing them, it will end up as a disaster.
True enough, and I agree we should be careful, and I think we can trust our CoCC to be careful in such matters, we trust them with the cases themselves after all. But with all due care, I think we can find the way to reveal the admin action was taken and why, without going into sensitive details. Even some detail would be better than what we have now, and in a case of a bad comment saying "This user has been temp. banned from date A till date B because of comments incompatible with CoC" doesn't seem to hurt anyone. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
