Re: Progressive Revelation Wikipedia quote

2013-02-28 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv
Anyone familiar with the correct chronology for some of the dates quoted?




 From: Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:06 PM
Subject: Progressive Revelation Wikipedia quote
 

 
The Baha'i Studies Listserv
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_of_Bah%C3%A1%27u%27ll%C3%A1h
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation_of_God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_revelation_%28Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%AD%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A1b
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1%27u%27ll%C3%A1h
No article for the Promised One Who Will Come After A Thousand Years

Let's date this:
Abraham circa 2000 BCE
Moses circa 1700-1200 BCE (Depends on which Pharaoh you identify as the Pharaoh)
Jesus circa 7 BCE - 37 CE
Muhammad circa 570 CE - 632 CE
Bab 1819 CE - 1850 CE
Bahaullah 1817 CE - 1892 CE
Promised One 2892 CE

You can notice a problem in the chart that it only lists Abrahamic 
Manifestations, they are all mentioned in the Abdul-Baha quote below. It leaves 
the impression of one Manifestation appears and predicts another Manifestation  
- 1700 years in the future with no Manifestations in the interim. Well, to be 
more precise there were no Abrahamic Mnaifestations in the interim periods, but 
there were Manifestations. The timeline above assumes only Abrahamic 
Manifestations, yet non-Abrahamic Manifestations appear in time periods between 
Abrahamic Manifestations. We are currently in a period of no new Abrahamic 
Manifestations for 1000 years. 


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroaster

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishna
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha

Dates are harder to come by:
Krishna circa before 6000 BCE - 500 BCE (before Abraham, between Abraham and 
Moses, between Moses and Jesus)
Zoroaster circa before 6000 BCE - 500 BCE (before Abraham, between Abraham and 
Moses, between Moses and Jesus)
Buddha circa 1050 BCE - 322 BCE (between Moses and Jesus)
The above dates are all based on a desire for accuracy without any care for 
precision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panthan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_avatar_claimants

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirthankara
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_twenty-eight_Buddhas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Buddha_claimants

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navnath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basava
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_Ravidass

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabir
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_gurus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadu_Dayal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayya_Vaikundar

Dates for some of the above (Mahavira between Moses and Jesus, all others 
between Muhammad and Bab)

Mahavira circa 599 BCE - 527 BCE

Matsyendranath circa 800 CE - 1000 CE

Basava aka Bhakti Bhandari Basavanna aka Basaveshwara 1134 CE -1196 CE

Guru Ravidassia 1376 CE - 1520 CE
Kabir 1440 CE - 1580 CE
Sikh gurus 1469 CE - 1708 CE (or Present if you count the eleventh)
Dadu Dayal 1544 CE - 1603 CE
Ayya Vaikundar circa 1809 CE - 1851 CE


That list just gives Dharmic/Indian religions, but there are other categories 
as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_founders_of_religious_traditions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Japan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Vietnam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Korea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_religious_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_Paganism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UFO_religions



Progressive revelation is a core teaching in the Bahá'í Faith that suggests 
that religious truth is revealed by God progressively and cyclically over time 
through a series of divine Messengers, and that the teachings are tailored to 
suit the needs of the time and place of their appearance.[7][8] Thus, the 
Bahá'í teachings recognize the divine origin of several world religions as 
different stages in the history of one religion, while believing that the 
revelation of Bahá'u'lláh is the most recent (though not the last), and 
therefore the most relevant to modern society.[7]
The general theme of the successive and continuous religions founded 
by Manifestations of God is that there is an evolutionary tendency, and 
that each Manifestation of God brings a larger measure of revelation (or 
religion) to humankind than the previous one.[9] The differences in the 
revelation brought by the Manifestations of God 
is stated 

Re: Progressive Revelation Wikipedia quote

2013-02-28 Thread Gary Selchert
The Baha'i Studies Listserv

Stop worrying about the chronology! The one you're using is fine. Go back and 
re-read the Kitab-i-Iqan a couple of times instead.


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Thu, Feb 28, 2013 11:02 am
Subject: Re: Progressive Revelation Wikipedia quote




The Baha'i Studies Listserv

Anyone familiar with the correct chronology for some of the dates quoted?



  
 
 
  
  From: Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com
 To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:06 PM
 Subject: Progressive Revelation Wikipedia quote
  
 




The Baha'i Studies Listserv

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_of_Bah%C3%A1%27u%27ll%C3%A1h
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation_of_God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_revelation_%28Bah%C3%A1%27%C3%AD%29


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A1b
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1%27u%27ll%C3%A1h
No article for the Promised One Who Will Come After A Thousand Years


Let's date this:
Abraham circa 2000 BCE
Moses circa 1700-1200 BCE (Depends on which Pharaoh you identify as the Pharaoh)
Jesus circa 7 BCE - 37 CE
Muhammad circa 570 CE - 632 CE
Bab 1819 CE - 1850 CE
Bahaullah 1817 CE - 1892 CE
Promised One 2892 CE


You can notice a problem in the chart that it only lists Abrahamic 
Manifestations, they are all mentioned in the Abdul-Baha quote below. It leaves 
the impression of one Manifestation appears and predicts another Manifestation  
- 1700 years in the future with no Manifestations in the interim. Well, to be 
more precise there were no Abrahamic Mnaifestations in the interim periods, but 
there were Manifestations. The timeline above assumes only Abrahamic 
Manifestations, yet non-Abrahamic Manifestations appear in time periods between 
Abrahamic Manifestations. We are currently in a period of no new Abrahamic 
Manifestations for 1000 years. 



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroaster

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishna
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha


Dates are harder to come by:
Krishna circa before 6000 BCE - 500 BCE (before Abraham, between Abraham and 
Moses, between Moses and Jesus)
Zoroaster circa before 6000 BCE - 500 BCE (before Abraham, between Abraham and 
Moses, between Moses and Jesus)
Buddha circa 1050 BCE - 322 BCE (between Moses and Jesus)
The above dates are all based on a desire for accuracy without any care for 
precision.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_religions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panthan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_avatar_claimants

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirthankara
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_twenty-eight_Buddhas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Buddha_claimants

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navnath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basava
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru_Ravidass

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabir
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_gurus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadu_Dayal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayya_Vaikundar


Dates for some of the above (Mahavira between Moses and Jesus, all others 
between Muhammad and Bab)

Mahavira circa 599 BCE - 527 BCE

Matsyendranath circa 800 CE - 1000 CE

Basava aka Bhakti Bhandari Basavanna aka Basaveshwara 1134 CE -1196 CE

Guru Ravidassia 1376 CE - 1520 CE
Kabir 1440 CE - 1580 CE
Sikh gurus 1469 CE - 1708 CE (or Present if you count the eleventh)
Dadu Dayal 1544 CE - 1603 CE
Ayya Vaikundar circa 1809 CE - 1851 CE



That list just gives Dharmic/Indian religions, but there are other categories 
as well.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_founders_of_religious_traditions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Japan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Vietnam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Korea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_religious_movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_Paganism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UFO_religions





Progressive revelation is a core teaching in the Bahá'í Faith that suggests 
that religious truth is revealed by God progressively and cyclically over time 
through a series of divine Messengers, and that the teachings are tailored to 
suit the needs of the time and place of their appearance.[7][8] Thus, the 
Bahá'í teachings recognize the divine origin of several world religions as 
different stages in the history of one religion, while believing that the 
revelation of Bahá'u'lláh is the most recent (though not the last

Re: Progressive Revelation [was question about Islam]

2006-05-11 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/11/06, Moghaddam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi Gilberto,



I was thinking about building a matrix comparing Baha'u'llah's Laws in the
Aqdas with the previous Books.  I started with the issue of slavery, since
you've brought this up.  Please let me know if there are other verses in the
Quran on the subject of slavery.


I think your matrix approach might be a bit misleading. But yes, there
are many other verses you left out. One good one is:

90.12] And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?
[90.13] (It is) the setting free of a slave,
[90.14] Or the giving of food in a day of hunger
[90.15] To an orphan, having relationship,
[90.16] Or to the poor man lying in the dust.
[90.17] Then he is of those who believe and charge one another to show
patience, and charge one another to show compassion.
[90.18] These are the people of the right hand.

So given that in the shariah there are limited ways for there to be
new slaves and there are multiple ways that freeing slaves is
encouraged or required, even under Islamic law it is natural for
slavery to end. If the government policy wanted to act like the
people of the right hand they could even buy all the slaves and free
them.


Peace

Gilberto




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation [was question about Islam]

2006-05-11 Thread Moghaddam
I'll add this verse in.Why do you feel this approach may bemisleading?BTW, I don't think such fundamental laws as slavery and polygamy were every okay, but the Messengers tried to gradually get rid of the practice over time. Moses didn't allow Jews to take slaves from their own kind, Jesus didn't really say much about it, and Muhammad made it a point, like the verse below, to express that it is wrong, yet, the practice was not completely, whollyforbidden until the most recent Revelation.A fundamentalist Muslim, Christian, or Jew may argue that this and that verse suggest it is okay to have a slave under this and that condition, given there is no definitive law forbidding slavery. But in this revelation I dont think slavery will ever be an issue because it has been categorically forbidden.  Gilberto Simpson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  On 5/11/06, Moghaddam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: Hi Gilberto, I was thinking about building a matrix comparing Baha'u'llah's Laws in the Aqdas with the previous Books. I started with the issue of slavery, since you've brought this up. Please let me know if there are other verses in the Quran on the subject of slavery.I think your matrix approach might be a bit misleading. But yes, thereare many other verses you left out. One good one is:90.12] And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?[90.13] (It is) the setting free of a slave,[90.14] Or the giving of food in a day of hunger[90.15] To an orphan, having relationship,[90.16] Or to the poor man lying in the dust.[90.17] Then he is of those who believe and charge one
 another to showpatience, and charge one another to show compassion.[90.18] These are the people of the right hand.So given that in the shariah there are limited ways for there to benew slaves and there are multiple ways that freeing slaves isencouraged or required, even under Islamic law it is natural forslavery to end. If the government policy wanted to act like "thepeople of the right hand" they could even buy all the slaves and freethem.PeaceGilbertoThe information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination,
 distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.__You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-stBaha'i Studies is available through the following:Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.eduWeb - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-stNews - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-stPublic - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaistOld Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.netNew Public -
 http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
		Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone  calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Progressive Revelation [was question about Islam]

2006-05-11 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/11/06, Moghaddam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


BTW, I don't think such fundamental laws as slavery and polygamy were every
okay, but the Messengers tried to gradually get rid of the practice over
time.


I won't comment on polygamy for now. I would treat that one
differently. But I would tend to agree on slavery. It's always morally
problematic. So the in terms of eternal moral principles, its always
been questionable. But in the past, economic necessity made it
difficult to prohibit categorically.

The moral principles haven't changed. But the situation has.

-Gilberto




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Dear Susan,
You wrote:   It is just that the term itself is derived from 
Christianity. 

Well, I'm not convinced it didn't originate with 
Baha'u'llah... OK, call me a die-hard!  ; )

The Guardian translated Gleanings, published in 1952.  So, 
conceding that the actual phrase originated with him ...

I'd now be interested in knowing when and why (to whom)  the 
original passage was written.  I don't find it in any other 
books.

With regard to the Christian connection, both The Approaching 
End of The Age, by H. Grattan Guinness in 1879 AD (referenced 
by Khazeh) and The Bible: A Progressive Revelation by S.L. 
Morgan, Sr. in the 1950's (referenced by Mark) were both 
written after the Declaration of Baha'u'llah.

Whoso reciteth, in the privacy of his chamber, the verses 
revealed by God, the scattering angels of the Almighty shall 
scatter abroad the fragrance of the words uttered by his 
mouth, and shall cause the heart of every righteous man to 
throb. Though he may, at first, remain unaware of its effect, 
yet the virtue of the grace vouchsafed unto him must needs 
sooner or later exercise its influence upon his soul. 
(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings from the Writings of Baha'u'llah, p. 
294)

There is also the world order phrase bantered about in 
recent years and will no doubt also be attributed to 
originating in the 20th Century;  however, we also have this 
from Baha'u'llah and translated by the Guardian:

LXX. The world's equilibrium hath been upset through the 
vibrating influence of this most great, this new World Order. 
Mankind's ordered life hath been revolutionized through the 
agency of this unique, this wondrous System -- the like of 
which mortal eyes have never witnessed.  (Baha'u'llah, 
Gleanings from the Writings of Baha'u'llah, p. 136)

lovingly,  Sandra

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Khazeh Fananapazir
In a sense, if we look deeply, and carefully, with a sense of the Sacred in
our heart we find Progressive Revelation adumbrated/anticipated/ alluded to
in all the Holy Books.

1] Hinduism
Krishna has promised in the Bhagavad Gita that whenever righteousness is on
the decline, and unrighteousness is in the ascendant, then God, though
birthless and deathless, and the Lord of all beings, manifests Himself
through His own Yogamaya (divine potency) keeping His Nature (Prakrti) under
control. 2 He says, For the protection of the virtuous, for the extirpation
of evil-doers, and for establishing Dharma (righteousness) on a firm
footing, I am born from age to age. 
2] Judaism
Psa 96:2  Sing unto the LORD, bless his name; shew forth his SALVATION FROM
DAY TO DAY.
Psa 19:2  DAY UNTO DAY uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth
knowledge. 
Psa 19:3  There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
3] New Testament
Mar 4:28  For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; FIRST the blade,
THEN the ear, AFTER that the full corn in the ear.
The commentator writes
FIRST THE BLADE - The green, tender shoot, that first starts out of the
earth before the stalk is formed.
THEN THE EAR - The original means the stalk or spire of wheat or barley, as
well as the ear.
THE FULL CORN - The ripe wheat. The grain swollen to its proper size. By
this is denoted, undoubtedly, that grace or religion in the heart is of
gradual growth. It is at first tender, feeble, perhaps almost imperceptible,
like the first shootings of the grain in the earth. Perhaps also, like
grain, it often lies long in the earth before there are signs of life. Like
the tender grain, also, it needs care, kindness, and culture. A frost, a
cold storm, or a burning sun alike injure it. So tender piety in the heart
needs care, kindness, culture. It needs shelter from the frosts and storms
of a cold, unfeeling world

And in the Holy Qur'an
023.044 
YUSUFALI: THEN SENT WE OUR MESSENGERS IN SUCCESSION: every time there came
to a people their messenger, they accused him of falsehood: so We made them
follow each other (in punishment): We made them as a tale (that is told): So
away with a people that will not believe! 
PICKTHAL: THEN WE SENT OUR MESSENGERS ONE AFTER ANOTHER. Whenever its
messenger came unto a nation they denied him; so We caused them to follow
one another (to disaster) and We made them bywords. A far removal for folk
who believe not! 
SHAKIR: Then We sent Our messengers one after another; whenever there came
to a people their messenger, they called him a liar, so We made some of them
follow others and We made them stories; so away with a people who do not
believe!
PALMER ¶ Then we sent our Apostles one after another. Whenever its Apostle
came to any nation they called him a liar; and we made some to follow
others; and we made them legends; away then with a people who do not
believe!  
SALE Afterwards we sent our Apostles, one after another. So often as their
Apostle came unto any nation, they charged him with imposture: And we caused
them successively to follow one another [to destruction]; and we made them
[only subjects of] traditional stories. Away therefore with the unbelieving
nations!  
RODWELL Then sent we our apostles one after another. Oft as their apostle
presented himself to a nation, they treated him as a liar; and we caused one
nation to follow another; and we made them the burden of a tale. Away then
with the people who believe not!  





__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:48:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 12/20/2004 11:30:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 But the Bahai faith isn't completely dissimilar to those groups. I
 think about A thief in the night and the related interpretations of
 the Millerite groups who as fundamentalists literally expected the
 coming of Jesus to bring justice and righteous to the earth.
 
  
 Yes, and it even goes further than that. The first millennial movement was
 started during the Crusades by Joachim  de Fiora who probably laid the
 groundwork for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would
 begin in the year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 in  
 the Christian one. 

Do you know how he came up with his prediction? (I don't). I mean that
would make a big difference in terms of whether switching calendars on
him is a reasonable thing to do. Did he come up with the number 1260,
and then pick the wrong start date. Or did he get 1260 AD some other
way?

Peace

Gilberto


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Gilberto Simpson
Never mind. Joachim gets 1260 from the 42 weeks of Daniel. Which I
think is the same as the Millerites and Sears. So all of this isn't
really independent confirmation. It all just depends on how you read
the Biblical prophecy.
And over the centuries different groups have read the exact same
prophecies and used them to predict the end of the world many
different times. The Beast has been identified with everyone from Nero
to the Pope to Luther to Hitler to Ronald Regan.

Peace

Gilberto




On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:13:54 -0500, Gilberto Simpson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:48:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 12/20/2004 11:30:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  But the Bahai faith isn't completely dissimilar to those groups. I
  think about A thief in the night and the related interpretations of
  the Millerite groups who as fundamentalists literally expected the
  coming of Jesus to bring justice and righteous to the earth.
 
 
  Yes, and it even goes further than that. The first millennial movement was
  started during the Crusades by Joachim  de Fiora who probably laid the
  groundwork for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would
  begin in the year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 
  in  the Christian one.
 
 Do you know how he came up with his prediction? (I don't). I mean that
 would make a big difference in terms of whether switching calendars on
 him is a reasonable thing to do. Did he come up with the number 1260,
 and then pick the wrong start date. Or did he get 1260 AD some other
 way?
 
 Peace
 
 Gilberto
 
 My people are hydroponic
 
 __
 You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
 Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
 Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
 News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
 Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
 Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
 New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
 


-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

At 10:28 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
So all of this isn't really independent confirmation. It all just depends on 
how you read the Biblical prophecy.

`Abdu'l-Baha was reported to have said:

The texts of the Holy Books are all symbolical, needing authoritative 
interpretation. 
-- Promulgation of Universal Peace, p.220

What do they symbolize? IMO, they symbolize the meanings in the minds of God, 
the writer, or the interpreter. In other words, prophecies, like all scriptural 
texts, whether their contents are clearly stated or ambiguous, have no 
independent meaning.

And over the centuries different groups have read the exact same prophecies 
and used them to predict the end of the world many different times. The Beast 
has been identified with everyone from Nero to the Pope to Luther to Hitler 
to Ronald Regan.

And they continue to do so. Full preterists believe that prophecies *prove* 
that Christ returned once and for all in 70 AD. Partial preterists believe they 
demonstrate that Christ returned in 70 AD and will return again in the future. 
Premillennialists, or futurists, argue that most biblical prophecies are 
fulfilled in the times immediately preceding the millennium. Historicists 
contend that prophecies have had a gradual fulfillment.

The meanings are in the minds of the interpreters, not in the texts.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:48:56 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gilberto,
 At 10:28 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
 So all of this isn't really independent confirmation. It all just depends 
 on how you read the Biblical prophecy.

 `Abdu'l-Baha was reported to have said:
 The texts of the Holy Books are all symbolical, needing authoritative 
 interpretation.
 -- Promulgation of Universal Peace, p.220

That seems like a really counter-intuitive juxtaposition of ideas. If
the scriptures are just inkblots which can mean anything, then it
doesn't makes sense that an authority can come in and tell you what
they mean. On the other hand, if the authority is really an authority
(like they have good connections with the author) then their
interpretation would at least partially convey what the text *really*
means (what the author had in mind). At least that's in the case of
scripture.

(although this inkblot perspective is growing on me. I still haven't
thought through my opinion on it. By any chance, have you seen the
movie Ghost Dog? It really reminds me of the inkblot perspective.
There are several examples in the movie of how individuals are
isolated from one another don't really communicate with one another.
Instead what happens is that one character gives out signals and the
other one makes reasonable inferences about what they want.)

Gilberto:
 And over the centuries different groups have read the exact same prophecies 
 and used them to predict the end of the world many different times. The 
 Beast has been identified with everyone from Nero to the Pope to Luther to 
 Hitler to Ronald Regan.

Mark:
 And they continue to do so. Full preterists believe that prophecies *prove* 
 that Christ returned once and for all in 70 AD. Partial preterists believe 
 they demonstrate that Christ returned in 70 AD and will return again in the 
 future. Premillennialists, or futurists, argue that most biblical prophecies 
 are fulfilled in the times immediately preceding the millennium. Historicists 
 contend that prophecies have had a gradual fulfillment.
]
Gilberto:
Okay, but aren't you willing to say that the Preterists are actually wrong?
Or are you saying that in some sense Christ really did return in 70 AD?


Peace

Gilberto

My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Susan Maneck
Do you know how he came up with his prediction? (I don't).

Dear Gilberto,

Yeah, if you read the Book of Revelations there are constant references to
one thousand two hundred and sixty days. There are other references to 3 1/2
days which also figure out to 1260 if you take each day to represent a year.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Susan Maneck
In order to get 1260 years from 3 1/2 days, you have to do a double
days-to-years conversion. First you change 3 1/2 days to 3 1/2 years. Then
you make 3 1/2 years (1260 days) into 1260 years.

Dear Mark,

Yes, of course. But if you read the Book of Revelations it becomes pretty
clear that the two numbers are used interchangeably and Abdu'l-Baha was
hardly the first person to notice this.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Mark A. Foster
Gilberto,

At 11:07 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
That seems like a really counter-intuitive juxtaposition of ideas. If the 
scriptures are just inkblots which can mean anything, then it doesn't makes 
sense that an authority can come in and tell you what they mean.

I think it indicates that, although some of the writers of the books 
incorporated into the Bible apparently predicted the return of Christ, much of 
the rest is subjective and guess work.

Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.
- words attributed to Jesus, cited: Matthew 25:13

On the other hand, if the authority is really an authority (like they have 
good connections with the author) then their interpretation would at least 
partially convey what the text *really* means (what the author had in mind). 
At least that's in the case of scripture.

I don't think that texts mean anything. Authors mean something. Those who 
inspire authors, including God, mean something. Interpreters mean something.

although this inkblot perspective is growing on me. 

lol. To use your analogy, all structurizations, or constructions, are, IMO, 
inkblots. Interpretations of those structurizations are standpoint 
epistemologies (Nancy Hartsock et al.). It then comes down to whether one 
accepts the authority of the person or persons holding to a particular 
standpoint.

I still haven't thought through my opinion on it. By any chance, have you 
seen the movie Ghost Dog?

No, but I just ordered the DVD from Amazon.

Okay, but aren't you willing to say that the Preterists are actually wrong? 
Or are you saying that in some sense Christ really did return in 70 AD?

It is a matter of authority. I think that the historicists come closest to the 
perspective taken by `Abdu'l-Baha. The full preterists are probably furthest 
from His perspective.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Susan,

At 12:01 PM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
Yes, of course. But if you read the Book of Revelations it becomes pretty 
clear that the two numbers are used interchangeably and Abdu'l-Baha was 
hardly the first person to notice this.

A lot of numbers, such as 12 and 40, are repeated in the texts of the Bible. 
However, they are used in different contexts.

I mentioned this point as an example of how `Abdu'l-Baha's interpretations, and 
His overall heuristics, must be accepted on faith.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
- Original Message - 
From: Khazeh Fananapazir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:46 AM
Subject: RE: Progressive Revelation

In a sense, if we look deeply, and carefully, with a sense of the Sacred in
our heart we find Progressive Revelation adumbrated/anticipated/ alluded to
in all the Holy Books.
Dear Khazeh,
Do you have the time to post the Buddhist and Zarathustrian references of 
the same character?
I will be most appreciative if you will post them.

Thank you,
Richard. 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Susan Maneck


A lot of numbers, such as 12 and 40, are repeated in the texts of the
Bible. However, they are used in different contexts.

Yes, I agree. What I am suggesting is that 1260 and 3 1/2 were really
interchangeable. And in this case, they are used in the same context.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:46:21 -, Khazeh Fananapazir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a sense, if we look deeply, and carefully, with a sense of the Sacred in
 our heart we find Progressive Revelation adumbrated/anticipated/ alluded to
 in all the Holy Books.

Do you have a specific definition of Progressive Revelation that one
can refer to? Because looking at the passage you quote in the Quran:

 023.044
 YUSUFALI: THEN SENT WE OUR MESSENGERS IN SUCCESSION: every time there came
 to a people their messenger, they accused him of falsehood: so We made them
 follow each other (in punishment): We made them as a tale (that is told): So
 away with a people that will not believe!

It says you the messengers were sent one after another but it doesn't
necessarily let you say exactly how the messengers or their messages
are related. Is one message higher than another? Deeper than another?
Easier than another? Harder than another? Better? Is it the exact same
message?

For example, in Martin Ling's book What is Sufism? he talks about
the various revelations but he compares them to waves coming in from
the Ocean. Every once in a while, the wave comes, and leaves behind
water. But the water is all the same. It comes from the same Ocean. So
is that what you mean? Or are you trying to say that the water in the
new wave is different from the water in the previous wave?

Peace

Gilberto

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-21 Thread Max Jasper
|Do you have a specific definition of Progressive Revelation 
|that one can refer to? Because looking at the passage you 
|quote in the Quran:

Sure, here it is:
http://studycircle.angeltowns.com/progressive.htm


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Susan Maneck

The term was first used by Baha'u'llah
in the following quote and expanded in the second quote from
Kitab-i-Aqdas footnotes:

snip
... And when this process of progressive
Revelation culminated in the stage at which His peerless, His
most sacred, and exalted Countenance was to be unveiled to
men's eyes,

Dear Sandra,

We talked about that passage a few months ago. The phrase translated as
Progressive Revelation here is IDHA BLAGHA AL-AMR which I think more
literally would be translated as this delivery of the Cause. It was the
Guardian who first introduced the term Progressive Revelation into Baha'i
theology and he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian theology.

warmest, Susan


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Sandra Chamberlain
Dear Susan,
Could you be a bit more explicit about this theory, as I'm not 
familiar with any possible source in Christian theology.

...he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian 
theology

While I'm open to a broader understanding of the term, I 
feel that because the passage from Baha'u'llah opens with : 
Contemplate with thine inward eye the chain of
successive Revelations that hath linked the Manifestation of 
Adam with that of the Báb.; He is indeed referring to the 
progressive (sequential  advancing) revelations of the 
Manifestations of God.  Granted, the Guardian elaborates on 
the progressive aspects of the Revelation as received by 
Baha'u'llah.

Thanks much!
lovingly,  Sandra 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:09:44 -0900, Sandra Chamberlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Susan,
 
 Could you be a bit more explicit about this theory, as I'm not
 familiar with any possible source in Christian theology.
 
 ...he in turn, seems to have gotten it from Christian
 theology
 

There is a Christian doctrine known as dispensationalism which breaks
human history into different periods (dispensations) where God deals
with human beings in a particular way. And certain events would mark
the transition points from one dispensation to another, for example,
the fall, the flood, the calling of abraham, the bringing of the law
from Sinai, the crucifixion, etc.


Peace

Gilberto
-- 


My people are hydroponic

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 7:33:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is 
  a Christian doctrine known as dispensationalism which breakshuman history 
  into different periods (dispensations) where God dealswith human beings in 
  a particular way

Dear Gilberto, 

This was a little different. Dispensationalism is usually associated with 
fundamentalism and is based on the premise that God's way of dealing with 
humanity changed dramatically. Ideas of Progressive Revelation in the 19th 
century were based more on the notion of God enfolding His nature to us 
overtime. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck



In a message dated 12/20/2004 5:06:45 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While 
  I'm open to a "broader" understanding of the term, I feel that because the 
  passage from Baha'u'llah opens with : "Contemplate with thine inward eye 
  the chain ofsuccessive Revelations that hath linked the Manifestation of 
  Adam with that of the Báb.";
Dear Sandy, 

Oh I think the concept is implicit in Baha'u'llah's Writings. It is just 
that the term itself is derived from Christianity. Khazeh posted the following 
website and Table of Contents of one 19th century work on this subject on 
Bridges some time ago. Since it wasn't exactly a personal post, I'm sure he 
won't mind if I place it below. I may have to take back what I said earlier 
about dispensationalism, but I think its ties are more with Christian 
millenarianism in general. 

warmest, Susan 
The bookTHE APPROACHING END OF THE AGEVIEWED IN THE LIGHT 
OFHISTORY, PROPHECY, AND SCIENCEbyH. GRATTAN 
GUINNESSMDCCCLXXIX (1879)IS AVAILABLE ON THE 
INTERNEThttp://www.historicism.com/Guinness/Approaching/aeota.htmPart 
I.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONCHAPTER I.GOD'S REVELATION OF 
HIMSELF TO MAN HAS BEEN A PROGRESSIVE ONE.- TRUTH INGENERAL HAS BEEN 
REVEALED PROGRESSIVELY. PROPHECY, THE DIVINE HISTORY OF THEFUTURE, CONSISTS 
OF A SERIES OF PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS.- PRACTICAL RESULTSOFTHE 
COMPREHENSION AND APPLICATION OF THIS PRINCIPLE.CHAPTER 
II.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE RELATIVE PERIOD OF THE SECOND 
ADVENT OFOURLORD JESUS CHRIST.CHAPTER 
III.PROGRESSIVE REVELATIONS AS TO THE MILLENNIUM, THE RESURRECTION, AND 
THEJUDGMENT.Part II.PROGRESSIVE 
INTERPRETATION.CHAPTER 1.HUMAN COMPREHENSION OF DIVINE PROPHECY 
HAS BEEN, AND WAS INTENDED TO BEPROGRESSIVE.-THREE IMPORTANT INFERENCES FROM 
DANIEL XII.9. - THERE IS ABLAMELESS AND A GUILTY IGNORANCE OF THE FULFILMENT 
OF PROPHECY. - INSTANCESOFEACH.- REASONS FOR A PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY 
OBSCURITY OF PROPHECY; AND MEANSBYWHICH PROGRESSIVE COMPREHENSION OF ITS 
SIGNIFICATION HAS BEEN GRANTED.CHAPTER II.CONSIDERATION 
OF CERTAIN BROAD PRINCIPLES, ON WHICH THE APOCALYPSE IS TO BEINTERPRETED.-IT 
IS A SYMBOLIC PROPHECY, AND MUST BE TRANSLATED INTO ORDINARYLANGUAGE BEFORE 
IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD.CHAPTER III.THE APOCALYPSE IS A 
CONTINUING PROPHECY EXTENDING FROM ITS OWN TIME, TO THECONSUMMATION OF ALL 
THINGS.-IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE, IN ORDER TOITSCORRECT 
INTERPRETATION. IT IS A PROPHECY CONCERNING THE EXPERIENCES OF THECHRISTIAN 
CHURCH, IN THE WORLD, AND NOT CONCERNING THOSE OF THE 
JEWISHNATION.Part III.FORETOLD AND 
FULFILLED.CHAPTER I.THE PROPHECIES OF "BABYLON," AND "THE 
BEAST."-REASONS FOR THE EXAMINATION OFTHESE TWO PROPHECIES. -FUNDAMENTAL, 
DIVINELY INTERPRETED; PRACTICALLYIMPORTANT.-BABYLON THE GREAT REPRESENTS THE 
APOSTATE CHURCH OF ROME.CHAPTER II.THE MAN OF SIN, OR 
ANTICHRIST.A GREAT FOURFOLD PROPHECY OF FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE (DAN 
7:7-27, REV 13:1-9,REV 17, 2THESS 2).- THE ROMAN POWER.-ITS LAST FORM AS 
PREDICTED HERE.-INDIVIDUAL AND DYNASTIC USE OF THE WORD "KING."- AN 
APOSTATE, BLASPHEMOUS,ANDPERSECUTING POWER,- EXACTLY ANSWERING TO THE 
ONE HERE PREDICTED, HAS BEEN INEXISTENCE FOR MORE THAN TWELVE CENTURIES, IN 
THE SUCCESSION OF THE POPES OFROME-ORIGIN OF THIS POWER.-ITS MORAL 
CHARACTER.- ITS SELF-EXALTINGUTTERANCES.-ITS SELF- EXALTING ACTS. -ITS 
SUBTLETIES; --FALSE DOCTRINES, AND LYINGWONDERS.-ITS IDOLATRIES. -ITS 
DOMINION.-ITS PERSECUTION OF THE 
SAINTS.-ITSDURATION.-ITSDOOM.Part IV.INQUIRY 
INTO THE DIVINE SYSTEM OF TIMES AND SEASONS NATURAL AND REVEALED.SECTION 
I. SOLAR AND LUNAR DOMINION CAUSAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL.CHAPTER 
I.CHRONOLOGY, BIBLICAL AND NATURAL. IS THERE HARMONY BETWEEN THE TWO? 
SOLARANDLUNAR DOMINION IN THE INORGANIC WORLD. SOLI-LUNAR CONTROL OF 
TERRESTRIALREVOLUTIONS. WINDS. RAINS, OCEAN CURRENTS. -TIDES, ELECTRIC AND 
MAGNETICVARIATIONS.CHAPTER II.SOLI-LUNAR DOMINION IN 
THE ORGANIC WORLD. EFFECTS OF LIGHT AND HEAT ON THEDEVELOPMENT AND 
DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS AND OF THE HUMAN RACE.-DIURNAL AND 
SEASONAL CHANGES IN RELATION TO HEALTH AND DISEASE.SECTION 
II.THE LAW OF COMPLETION IN WEEKS.CHAPTER I.THE WEEK IN 
RELATION TO THE PERIODICITY OF VITAL PHENOMENA. PERIODICITY 
INTHEDEVELOPMENT OF INSECTS, FISHES, BIRDS AND MAMMALIA.-PERIODICITY IN 
THEGROWTHAND FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY OF MANKIND IN HEALTH AND IN 
DISEASE.CHAPTER II.THE WEEK IN SCRIPTURE. THERE IS - A 
CHRONOLOGICAL SYSTEM IN SCRIPTURE.-IT ISASYSTEM OF WEEKS.- THIS SYSTEM 
IS TRACEABLE THROUGHOUT THE LAW, THE PROPHETS,AND THE GOSPEL.-THE WEEK IN 
THE MOSAIC RITUAL.-THE WEEK IN. JEWISHHISTORY.-THEWEEK IN PROPHECY.-THE 
WEEK OF DAYS -OF WEEKS-OF MONTHS-OF YEARS-OF WEEKS OFYEARS-OF YEARS OF 
YEARS-OF MILLENARIES.CHAPTER III.THE WEEK IN 
HISTORY.SCRIPTURE THE CHART OF HISTORY.-PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS AS TO 
HISTORIC ANDPROPHETIC CHRONOLOGY.- THE AGE OF THE HUMAN RACE. -OLD 
TESTAMENTCHRONOLOGY.-THE HEBREW AND THE SEPTUAGINT CHRONOLOGY COMPARED.- 
HOW ARE WE TO INTERPRETTHESYMBOLIC 

Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Gilberto,

At 10:54 PM 12/20/2004, you wrote:
If you didn't have Dispensationalism in mind, which was the Christian concept 
you were thinking of which was similar to progressive revelation?

Here is an example:

http://adams.patriot.net/~eastland/slm/ 

It isn't exactly either premillennial dispensationalism or Reformed covenant 
theology.

With regards, Mark A. Foster * 15 Sites: http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger -- Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 10:55:10 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you 
  didn't have Dispensationalism in mind, which was the Christianconcept you 
  were thinking of which was similar to 
progressiverevelation?

Dear Gilberto, 

I think progressive revelation was a much more general concept in 
Christianity than Dispensationalism which is rather specific. I was raised 
liberal Presbyterian but I heard the Bible spoken of in terms of progressive 
revelation when I was growing up. Indeed, modern Process Theology in some ways 
grows out of that. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/20/2004 11:30:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the 
  Bahai faith isn't completely dissimilar to those groups. Ithink about "A 
  thief in the night" and the related interpretations ofthe Millerite groups 
  who as fundamentalists literally expected thecoming of Jesus to bring 
  justice and righteous to the earth.


Yes, and it even goes further than that. The first millennial movement was 
started during the Crusades by Joachim de Fiora who probably laid the 
groundwork for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would 
begin in the year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 in the 
Christian one. 

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




RE: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread dlmbrt












Susan Maneck wrote:



The first millennial movement was started
during the Crusades by Joachim de Fiora who probably laid the groundwork
for dispensationalism. He held that Age of the Holy Spirit would begin in the
year 1260 A.D. Of course 1260 in the Muslim calendar is 1844 in the Christian
one. 

[D.A.L.] I
hadnt run across this most interesting bit of information before.
Could you give a little more of this history, or perhaps point me towards some
further reading?



Many
thanks.Dave Lambert






__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu






Re: Progressive Revelation

2004-12-20 Thread Smaneck




In a message dated 12/21/2004 12:44:51 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I 
  hadnt run across this most interesting bit of information before. Could 
  you give a little more of this history, or perhaps point me towards some 
  further reading?
  

Here's some websites on him: http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc06/htm/everlasting_gospel.htm
http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintj3y.htm

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu