Your tone is extremely condescending. I chose the emoji because it is rude.
You could read my works. My latest essay that addresses Drexciya and UR and Moodymann and revolution is getting some pretty good reviews. I already shared the book in an earlier email. I’m arrogant, but not arrogant enough to post the link again. Also, I don’t care about 1 or 10 or 50 white people who are bigots, you’re all the same to me. I’m not gonna waste my energy debating with you about who you are. And I have to look like you. It sux. 😢 Denise > On Nov 6, 2018, at 07:42, Steven Robertson <stev...@k-os.net> wrote: > > Yes I suppose it did. I wasn't aware that I was thinking about it, but as it > happens I came across other information a couple of days ago which opened my > eyes, and I will admit when I was wrong. To be fair, I am sometimes > processing things well beyond a conversation. I do not have a neuro-typical > mind, and often struggle to keep up with a conversation. > > The feeling I woke up with this morning was that James Stinson did feel very > strongly about it, that I should know, and I hand't really listened to what > he said in the interview. I felt bad about it, because it was ignorant. In > the same manner I would defend other parties that fail to appreciate the > sensitive nature of it, as probably not aware of the insult. I just didn't > see it that way, that the interpretation as a listener probably just suited > my own world view. I want to be clear that I'm not disappointed if that were > the case, and I regret writing that I would be disappointed. I am not > personally ashamed, but I see no reason to be disappointed. It's fair enough. > I just don't really know enough about it, leading to my ignorance. > > It's funny the emoticon you have put there looks like happy surprise (though > it probably depends on the image being used in the particular email reader I > guess). It's hard to tell if it's meant to be. You seem happily provocative, > and I don't really object to that. I might go and read more of what you have > got to say about it. The music is something else in any case, but I accept > that you probably know a lot better the motivations behind the music, and > that you may be right. > >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, at 12:15 PM, denisedalph...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> It took you this long to think of a response. 😲 >> >>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 04:07, Steven Robertson <stev...@k-os.net> wrote: >>> Denise >>> >>> I woke up this morning having had a dream where I hadn't really heard what >>> James Stinson was saying to Andrew Duke, that it was about racism, and that >>> Denise was right. The feeling was strong. Only 20 minutes later I'm writing >>> this and I'm still half asleep, but I know this was playing on my mind >>> since reading an article on the mostly unknown involvement of Scottish >>> families in the slave trade, and how Glasgow and Edinburgh benefited, and >>> honoured those families. It makes you feel sick. >>> >>> I'm not well read on history, but I also have read more recently about the >>> practically unknown, hidden and widespread occupation of Scotland by the >>> British army for many many years following the battle of Culloden. >>> Following that were the highland clearances, ordered by land-owners in >>> England. There's a monument to one of them, the Duke of Sutherland, twice >>> an MP in the British Parliament, he later became the British ambassador in >>> Paris. People demand that the statue be removed, or at least moved. In >>> short, it says more about the British involvement in the slave trade at the >>> time, but Scotland is shamed. Ports were not directly used, but they were >>> used in some arrangement which was directly involved with the slave trade. >>> I felt that we had nothing to do with that ugly business. I was born in >>> Glasgow, and my ancestors there were all poor working class families. I >>> think we should be taught this stuff in school. That's all white-washing >>> and as a result we are mostly ignorant. I will apologise for my own >>> ignorance, and appreciate that you may be right. I certainly woke with a >>> strong feeling that you could be. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Steve >>> >>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, at 7:23 PM, denisedalph...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> I didn’t say that Black people would be, should be, or are offended. Read >>>> my original statements. I’m confused by your rage. Better yet, you’re >>>> confused by your rage. >>>> >>>> Denise >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 24, 2018, at 13:33, Joe Marougi <jmaro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Even though English is my second language I just looked it up and I feel >>>>> that it was an accurate description of her intentions based on >50% of >>>>> the synonyms being a match. >>>>> >>>>> Could I have used another word? Sure, there are many synonyms to choose >>>>> from. I think “not being fair” and “not applying proper moral >>>>> principles” is precisely what she’s guilty of: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS761US761&hl=en-US&ei=_KnQW9COIdrB0PEPjLmWgAM&ins=false&q=unscrupulous&oq=uns&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.1.0.35i39j0i131l2j46i20i264j0i131.3280.5506..6457...1.0..3.502.2111.0j9j1j5-1......0....1.......5..0j0i71j0i10j46i39j0i131i20i264.72dD2dpqNVQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:19 AM kent williams <chaircrus...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> I think it's fine to disagree, even to argue, but putting on my 313 List >>>>> Administrator Crown and picking up my 313 List Administrator Sceptre, let >>>>> me say this: >>>>> >>>>> I think that calling other list members 'unscrupulous' is over the line. >>>>> And in this particular case, patently absurd. Denise has strong opinions >>>>> and you can argue about them all you want, but she is not unscrupulous. >>>>> >>>>> To quote Inigo Montoya, "I do not think it means what you think it >>>>> means." >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:03 PM Joe Marougi <jmaro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Agreed, >>>>> >>>>> However I do feel that unscrupulous race-baiting should be called out >>>>> just as much as actual racist views/comments. >>>>> >>>>> Next subject? 🤓👊🏿 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:48 AM ja...@iridite.com <ja...@iridite.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Heh - you obviously weren't part of our.....discussion about Dixon Avenue >>>>> Basement Jams a year or so ago on Facebook :) >>>>> >>>>> ANYWAY....let's move off the insta-drama and on to the music..much love, >>>>> massive respect, nuff said >>>>> >>>>> Jason >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 17:42, kent williams <chaircrus...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Tom Cox got the fuck out of the 313 list when the getting was good. He's >>>>> still as opinionated as ever, still doing battle with the sucka MCs >>>>> (aren't we all?), but I think he mostly stays out of trouble these days. >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to remember when he posted to 313 last. Something like 15 >>>>> years ago? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:38 AM Martin Dust <mar...@dustscience.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > On 24 Oct 2018, at 17:36,ja...@iridite.com wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Where's Tom Cox when you need him? He's always got a calm and measured >>>>> > response in situations like this. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Proper LOL >>> >
