.... and Jamie Liddell's giant skirt on a platform was amusing! ... the
material seemed weak on first listen to me too, however. But so many such
things have grown on me so I won't write it off yet ...

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Toby Frith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:51 PM
>To: Jonny McIntosh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
>Subject: Re: [313] Metropolis @ Royal Festival Hall
>
>
>I'd agree with the Super_Collider comments. It looked like an A-Level Art
>performance. Everybody seems to be raving about their new LP though.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jonny McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org <313@hyperreal.org>
>Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:19 PM
>Subject: Re: [313] Metropolis @ Royal Festival Hall
>
>
>> And mine too:
>>
>> > My tuppeny worth
>>
>> I thought the film was almost awful. I'm glad they cut it down. God only
>> knows why such a lumbering primary school plot originally required over
>two
>> and half hours. The feeble grasp of Marxism (in the 1920s for
>God's sake!)
>> is bad enough, never mind the saccharine "love conquers all" resolution.
>Oh
>> dear. Visually, though, "Metropolis" entirely deserves it's reputation.
>The
>> robot replica was pretty techno. Mills' music is ace, but I
>don't think it
>> fitted all that well, though it worked best when it was more storming:
>> "Robot Replica" and the destroy the machines scene. There were a lot of
>> moments where I thought the music was ill timed - though it was cool to
>> watch a film with the soundtrack as the object of interest, and I think I
>> appreciate much more how much effort has to go into scores to be
>successful.
>> Scoring for a silent movie and striking the balance between subtlety and
>> expressing when there's no dialogue is probably even harder. I think
>Mills'
>> Metropolis comes down more on the, err, "Scarface" side of that
>balance :)
>>
>> From where I was sat in cheap seats, the mosh pit that developed during
>the
>> DJ set was pretty entertaining, though some charted accountant behind me
>> started dancing as if he'd been restraining himself all evening at this
>> point and whipped out one of those little light gadgets.
>>
>> Matt Herbert put on a great show. Though I still liked the idea of it
>better
>> than the sound. I got one of those free cds which I've not listened to
>yet,
>> but I might do as requested and pass it on :) Super Collider, by
>contrast,
>> seemed pretty inept. I really liked the LP, but this show, IMO, was like
>> sitting through bad performance art set to turgid trip hop (with a weak
>> drummer to boot).
>>
>> Oh, and it was a tremendous view from the balcony out behind the stalls.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to