Moooooo!

Well ....I wouldn't be so harsh myself Rob. I mean, even despite the
fact that I agree what you're saying raises an important point, isn't it
better for UR in some form to be playing somewhere, than nowhere at all?

You can be sure that lots of possibilities were discussed before what
actually happened occurred, and similar discussions are ongoing, take it
from me.

There are lots of variables to consider and it really isn't so cut and
dried (these days?) as to where a worthwhile bunch a people can get a
worthwhile gig at a particular space in time ... tomorrow it might well
be the 'so-called underground' 

(Plus don't forget the Outlet thing!)


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 July 2006 15:27
To: Martin Dust; 313 Detroit
Subject: RE: (313) did anyone go to...

Well it's all very well huffing and puffing about being underground, but
it's a little rich when they refuse to play for underground promoters in
London and instead play at a soulless cattlemarket that's the clubbing
equivalent of Sony. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 July 2006 12:57
To: 313 Detroit
Subject: Re: (313) did anyone go to...


On 20 Jul 2006, at 13:45, fab. wrote:

> but is it "proper" techno though?

I would say so...

>
> i havent seen "UR Live" but i have seen "UR presents Timeline Live" 
> and it was a live funk jam more than anything else.
> Alot of people were not aware of the project and thought they were 
> going to see UR people play live techno and came away very 
> disappointed.
> Could that be the reason people are not responding positively?

I guess some of the old "heads" could be disappointed, but it's
interesting, no?

m



>> I think it's a brave move and probably a good way to present Techno, 
>> especially in the USA - where people are more accepting of the "band"
>> format, this is something that Dan Sicko hinted at in his book and 
>> seems to me like the next logical step to, at the very least, making 
>> a difference.
>>
>> They may have been unlucky with some of their slots of late but then 
>> again who here hasn't at one time or another played to an empty room 
>> or been in one!


########################################################################
#############
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received
this email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
########################################################################
#############

Reply via email to